From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Embedded PPC Linux list <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove obsolete arch/ppc/8xx_io/uart.c
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:47:54 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410071246210.5536@dell.enoriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410071158320.5191@dell.enoriver.com>
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 06:07:45AM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> this patch for linuxppc-2.5 removes the old uart driver which doesn't
>>> work since a long time and has already been replaced by
>>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/*.
>>
>> Can you please re-do this patch vs a linux-2.6 tree? Thanks.
>
> at the risk of jumping on on this, this patch would be affected by the
> changes i made to Kconfig, and i've already listed (to myself) the changes
> that are represented by this fix. (see previous post, in which i asked a few
> more annoying questions. :-)
>
> if you want, i can throw together the patch for this. as i see it, the
> changes are
>
> 1) modify Kconfig to remove choice of "Use UART"
> 2) modify Makefile to remove inclusion of uart.o
> 3) remove uart.c entirely
>
> is that about it?
no, apparently, that's not it. there is some significant conflict
resolution to be done between a couple Kconfig submenus. details to
follow as i figure it out, provided i actually understand what i'm
looking at. definitely not as simple as i thought at first.
rday
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-07 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1096517265.27208.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2004-10-07 15:40 ` [PATCH] remove obsolete arch/ppc/8xx_io/uart.c Tom Rini
2004-10-07 16:00 ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-10-07 16:47 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2004-10-07 17:30 ` Tom Rini
2004-10-07 18:09 ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-10-07 18:48 ` Tom Rini
2004-10-07 19:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-10-07 21:37 ` Dan Malek
2004-10-07 22:09 ` Tom Rini
2004-10-07 22:27 ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-10-07 22:42 ` Tom Rini
2004-10-08 2:21 ` Dan Malek
2004-10-08 14:22 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.60.0410071246210.5536@dell.enoriver.com \
--to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).