From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D646FDDF23 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 04:18:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:18:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: for-2.6.23 branch in powerpc.git created In-Reply-To: <4672D694.5060701@freescale.com> Message-ID: References: <18034.6787.951861.623265@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <4672D694.5060701@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Scott Wood wrote: > Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > These two i2c patches: > > > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-June/037327.html > > This looks OK as an interim measure, though at some point I'd like to get > around to letting both devices and drivers specify a list of match names. > > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-June/037328.html > > I'd leave out the device_type, and the "rtc" in "rtc-r5c372" is redundant if No, it is not redundant, it has to match rs5c372_driver.driver.name. > that's all the r5c372 chip does, but other than that it looks good. > > > also would be nice to get in, although, they only make sense with an ack > > from Scott Wood and another patch from him, as explained in links above... > > I assume you mean "Call of_register_i2c_devices() for fsl-i2c" > (http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-May/036333.html)? Yes. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski