* still not clear on which tree to be using these days
@ 2005-03-25 21:19 Robert P. J. Day
2005-03-25 21:52 ` Dan Malek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2005-03-25 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Embedded PPC Linux list
what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel on
8xx? for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from
bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the
latest stock 2.6.x release.
what's the status on patches that were submitted against the bk
tree? have they been pushed upstream? etc, etc.
rday
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: still not clear on which tree to be using these days
2005-03-25 21:19 still not clear on which tree to be using these days Robert P. J. Day
@ 2005-03-25 21:52 ` Dan Malek
2005-03-25 22:11 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Malek @ 2005-03-25 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list
On Mar 25, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel on
> 8xx? for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from
> bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the
> latest stock 2.6.x release.
I just use the latest kernel.org tree for everything. If I'm submitting
a patch, or working with someone else, I use the bk tree just to
be that little more up to date.
-- Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: still not clear on which tree to be using these days
2005-03-25 21:52 ` Dan Malek
@ 2005-03-25 22:11 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2005-03-25 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Malek; +Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Dan Malek wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel
> > on 8xx? for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from
> > bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the
> > latest stock 2.6.x release.
>
> I just use the latest kernel.org tree for everything. If I'm
> submitting a patch, or working with someone else, I use the bk tree
> just to be that little more up to date.
i just downloaded the 2.6.11-5 kernel source and was a bit nonplussed
to discover that "8xx" wasn't in the list of choices for processor,
until i noticed in the Kconfig file that 8xx depends on "BROKEN". oh,
my. :-) live and learn.
rday
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-25 22:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-25 21:19 still not clear on which tree to be using these days Robert P. J. Day
2005-03-25 21:52 ` Dan Malek
2005-03-25 22:11 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).