linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark prop unused in early_init_dt_scan_chosen().
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:06:46 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0705101806130.7750@pademelon.sonytel.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4643404E.30608@freescale.com>

On Thu, 10 May 2007, Scott Wood wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 May 2007, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > -	u32 *prop;
> > > > +	u32 __attribute__((unused)) *prop;
> > > 
> > > is this the desired way to remove warnings related to CONFIG_ options?  I
> > > know in the past we'd wrap it with a #ifdef CONFIG_FOO
> 
> Granted...  in this case, it looked as if there could be potential for using
> it for other things in the future as well.  That, and the extra ifdefs are
> ugly. :-)
> 
> > Exactly my thought.
> > 
> > Another advantage of #ifdef CONFIG_FOO is that if the actual code that uses
> > it
> > goes away, we'll get a warning again. Else in the end we'll be stuck with
> > zillions of unused variables that don't cause warnings...
> 
> Again, granted -- though I'd say the primary problem in that case is functions
> that are too long to determine that by visual inspection alone.
> 
> I agree with Michael Ellerman that it'd be best to just factor the initrd
> stuff out into its own function.

Yes, Michael Ellerman's patch is an even better solution.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- Sony Network and Software Technology Center Europe (NSCE)
Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com ------- The Corporate Village, Da Vincilaan 7-D1
Voice +32-2-7008453 Fax +32-2-7008622 ---------------- B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium

      reply	other threads:[~2007-05-10 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-08 17:14 [PATCH] Mark prop unused in early_init_dt_scan_chosen() Scott Wood
2007-05-08 23:56 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-05-09  0:41   ` David Gibson
2007-05-10  3:39 ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-10  7:39   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-10 15:54     ` Scott Wood
2007-05-10 16:06       ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0705101806130.7750@pademelon.sonytel.be \
    --to=geert.uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).