From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:07:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610191057040.8873@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610190959560.8433@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I would expect this patch to fix your issues. This will allow fallback
> allocations to occur in the page allocator during slab bootstrap. This
> means your per node queues will be contaminated as they were before. After
> the slab allocator is fully booted then the per node queues will become
> gradually become node clean.
Forgot to mention the results of this contamination: The bootstrap process
exercises fine control over data structures to place them in such a way
that the slab allocator can perform optimally. F.e. data structures are
placed in such a way on nodes that a kmalloc does not need a single off
node reference.
The contamination will disrupt this placement. The slab believes that
memory is from a different node than were it actually came from. As a
result key data structures (such as cpucache descriptors) are placed
on the wrong node. kmalloc and other slab operations may require
off node allocations for every call. Depending on the NUMA factor this may
have a significant influence on overall system performance (We have
measured this effect to cause a drop of 20% in AIM7 performance!).
In addition to this stuff, I am right now dealing with huge page
fault serialization (introduced to safely support DB2) and sparsemem
continually causing nested table lookups in fundamental vm operations. All
work of IBM people. Not interested in performance at all?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-19 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-13 18:41 kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177! Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-13 19:53 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 20:57 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 21:22 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-10-13 21:34 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-13 22:01 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-13 22:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-16 16:00 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 19:20 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 19:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-16 20:50 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 23:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 6:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 15:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:19 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 21:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 5:03 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 16:30 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-19 16:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 22:23 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 22:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 7:18 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-20 14:18 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 14:59 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-20 15:19 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 16:00 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-20 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 18:07 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 17:13 ` Will Schmidt
[not found] ` <8a76dfd735e544016c5f04c98617b87d@pinky>
2006-10-20 16:30 ` [PATCH] Reintroduce NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES for powerpc Mel Gorman
2006-10-20 17:34 ` kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177! Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 22:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 17:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 18:07 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-10-19 20:37 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:43 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 22:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 20:38 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 16:06 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0610191057040.8873@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).