From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mtl.rackplans.net (mtl.rackplans.net [69.90.0.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DB7DDE1F for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:40:17 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:07:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Gerhard Mack To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers. In-Reply-To: <20070404022828.5c9b97f3@the-village.bc.nu> Message-ID: References: <1175644642.10567.31.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070403221002.GA13210@cynthia.pants.nu> <1175648051.10567.61.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070403.181645.68159458.davem@davemloft.net> <20070404022828.5c9b97f3@the-village.bc.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, David Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Alan Cox wrote: > You don't get machines with 64 ethernet ports on add-in cards. There are > good reasons for the naming schemes in use. If they made them I'd build one. http://innerfire.net/pics/projects/21portfirewall_2.jpg Gerhard -- Gerhard Mack gmack@innerfire.net <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.