From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D6CDDE0D for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:20:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from cpe-66-69-204-88.austin.res.rr.com ([66.69.204.88] helo=[192.168.1.2]) by nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hee3h-0000qr-9b for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:20:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:16:52 -0500 (CDT) From: Kumar Gala To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: [RFC/PATCH] Change 440GP platform to ppc440 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I don't see any reason the 440GP should its own platform. Posting this to see if anyone thinks otherwise. - k diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c index 6b59e40..4237aea 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c @@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ static struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = { .cpu_user_features = COMMON_USER_BOOKE, .icache_bsize = 32, .dcache_bsize = 32, - .platform = "ppc440gp", + .platform = "ppc440", }, { /* 440GP Rev. C */ .pvr_mask = 0xf0000fff, @@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ static struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = { .cpu_user_features = COMMON_USER_BOOKE, .icache_bsize = 32, .dcache_bsize = 32, - .platform = "ppc440gp", + .platform = "ppc440", }, { /* 440GX Rev. A */ .pvr_mask = 0xf0000fff,