From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.sgi.com [192.48.171.29]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466E1DDE3D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:14:30 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:14:26 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix boot problem in situations where the boot CPU is running on a memoryless node In-Reply-To: <84144f020801231302g2cafdda9kf7f916121dc56aa5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20080123075821.GA17713@aepfle.de> <20080123121459.GA18631@aepfle.de> <20080123125236.GA18876@aepfle.de> <20080123135513.GA14175@csn.ul.ie> <20080123155655.GB20156@csn.ul.ie> <20080123195220.GB3848@us.ibm.com> <84144f020801231302g2cafdda9kf7f916121dc56aa5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Olaf Hering , Linux MM , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Nishanth Aravamudan , akpm@linux-foundation.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote: > I think Mel said that their configuration did work with 2.6.23 > although I also wonder how that's possible. AFAIK there has been some > changes in the page allocator that might explain this. That is, if > kmem_getpages() returned pages for memoryless node before, bootstrap > would have worked. Regular kmem_getpages is called with GFP_THISNODE set. There was some breakage in 2.6.22 and before with GFP_THISNODE returning pages from the wrong node if a node had no memory. So it may have worked accidentally and in an unsafe manner because the pages would have been associated with the wrong node which could trigger bug ons and locking troubles.