From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 kernel panic while bootup on powerpc ()
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:56:42 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803041151360.18160@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020803041141x5bb55832r495d7fde92356e27@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > I suspect the WARN_ON() is bogus although I really don't know that part
> > > of the code all too well. Mel?
> > >
> >
> > The warn-on is valid. A situation should not exist that allows both flags to
> > be set. I suspect if remove-set_migrateflags.patch was reverted from -mm
> > the warning would not trigger. Christoph, would it be reasonable to always
> > clear __GFP_MOVABLE when __GFP_RECLAIMABLE is set for SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT.
Slab allocations should never be passed these flags since the slabs do
their own thing there.
The following patch would clear these in slub:
---
mm/slub.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1.orig/mm/slub.c 2008-03-04 11:53:47.600342756 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1/mm/slub.c 2008-03-04 11:55:40.153855150 -0800
@@ -1033,8 +1033,8 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
struct page *page;
int pages = 1 << s->order;
+ flags &= ~GFP_MOVABLE_MASK;
flags |= s->allocflags;
-
page = alloc_slab_page(flags | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY,
node, s->order);
if (unlikely(!page)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080304011928.e8c82c0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-03-04 13:12 ` [BUG] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 kernel panic while bootup on powerpc () Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-04 14:40 ` Michael Neuling
2008-03-04 18:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-05 8:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-06 0:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-06 0:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-06 0:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 18:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-04 19:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-04 19:35 ` Mel Gorman
2008-03-04 19:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-04 19:56 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-03-04 20:01 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-03-04 20:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-04 20:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-04 20:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-05 2:28 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-04 20:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 20:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-04 21:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-05 14:02 ` Mel Gorman
2008-03-05 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2008-03-04 20:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-05 8:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04 19:20 ` [BUG] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 kernel bug while running libhugetlbfs Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-04 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 22:01 ` Adam Litke
2008-03-05 7:52 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-05 21:34 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 ppc64 boot hang Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-05 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-05 22:35 ` Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-05 23:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0803041151360.18160@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).