From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1F2DDF99
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:30:56 +1100 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2L9Uqgi008081
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:30:52 -0500
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:27:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: RFC - use of _stext vs PAGE_OFFSET?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803210426410.8073@blarg.am.freescale.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Is there any reason not use use _stext?

- k

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
index cd870a8..b0989ca 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	if (ppc_md.panic)
 		setup_panic();

-	init_mm.start_code = PAGE_OFFSET;
+	init_mm.start_code = (unsigned long)_stext;
 	init_mm.end_code = (unsigned long) _etext;
 	init_mm.end_data = (unsigned long) _edata;
 	init_mm.brk = klimit;