From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20020418214208.642@smtp.adsl.oleane.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:37:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Giuliano Pochini To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: asm info Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > Hi Giuliano. Just out of curiosity: what do you plan to > "altivec'ize" ? I'm doing it here or there too (the current > xvid CVS for example contain some altivec stuff). Nothing. I was just curious. I have a good old bwG3 (yet grrr!). > Inline assembly is a lot more tricky because mostly of the way > the registers are "abstracted" by the inline assembler to let the > compiler assign them. Yes, I know why, but I don't know how :) I don't want to use inline asm, I want to be able to read the code that contains it. Bye. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/