Re: egcs-1.1.2-RPM

Re: egcs-1.1.2-RPM

[Kaoru Fukui]

From: Andreas Tobler <a.tobler@schweiz.ch>
To: linux ppc <linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org>, "linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
" <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: egcs-1.1.2-RPM
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:01:36 +0100

> 
> Hi,
> 
> maybe a dump question, is anybody working on a RPM for
> egcs-1.1.2-glibc1.99? And or egcs-1.1.2-glibc-2.1.
> If not can I try it by adapting a RPM from a earlier release? I never
> made a RPM from scratch, I only modified them.
> 
> Yesterday, I built egcs-1.1.2 under R4.1. It worked out of the box?! Now
> I have to compare the test results. I can't believe it, before I had so
> many troubles building an egcs directly from egcs.cygnus.com.
> 
> A last question, what are the minimal requirements to build egcs under
> pre-R5. Means glibc etc.

I have egcs-1.1.2 for glibc-2.1.
Here is ftp://ppc.linux.or.jp/pub/users/fukui/Drugstore-in-Rawhide/new-egcs-glibc/
RPMS

If you want to use egcs on glibc-1.99 ,You patch  it tranpoline.patch.
Mr. Gary have  that patch.

I use  glibc-2.1 on PM-6100.

Thanks.

Kaoru Fukui
fukui@ppc.linux.or.jp




[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

Re: egcs-1.1.2-RPM

[Gary Thomas]

I have now built and [somewhat] tested EGCS-1.1.2.  You can find [R4] RPMS at:
  ftp://ftp.linuxppc.org/linuxppc/users/gdt/
I've uploaded today:
        redhat/RPMS/ppc/egcs-1.1-2a.ppc.rpm
        redhat/RPMS/ppc/egcs-as-gcc-1.1-2a.ppc.rpm
        redhat/RPMS/ppc/egcs-c++-1.1-2a.ppc.rpm
        redhat/RPMS/ppc/egcs-g77-1.1-2a.ppc.rpm
        redhat/SRPMS/egcs-1.1-2a.src.rpm

Note: these are the same 'vintage' as the previous RPMS.  That means that there are
no "vtable thunks" and that the trampoline code is still awry.  This will not change
until R5 arrives.

Good luck.

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

egcs-1.1.2-RPM

[Andreas Tobler]

Hi,

maybe a dump question, is anybody working on a RPM for
egcs-1.1.2-glibc1.99? And or egcs-1.1.2-glibc-2.1.
If not can I try it by adapting a RPM from a earlier release? I never
made a RPM from scratch, I only modified them.

Yesterday, I built egcs-1.1.2 under R4.1. It worked out of the box?! Now
I have to compare the test results. I can't believe it, before I had so
many troubles building an egcs directly from egcs.cygnus.com.

A last question, what are the minimal requirements to build egcs under
pre-R5. Means glibc etc.

Thanks
Andreas
-- 
| Andreas Tobler				
| CH-8004 Zuerich 							
| E-Mail: andreas.tobler@alcatel.ch	| a.tobler@schweiz.ch
-----------------------------------------------------------

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

RE: egcs-1.1.2-RPM

[Gary Thomas]

On 17-Mar-99 Andreas Tobler wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> maybe a dump question, is anybody working on a RPM for
> egcs-1.1.2-glibc1.99? And or egcs-1.1.2-glibc-2.1.
> If not can I try it by adapting a RPM from a earlier release? I never
> made a RPM from scratch, I only modified them.
> 
> Yesterday, I built egcs-1.1.2 under R4.1. It worked out of the box?! Now
> I have to compare the test results. I can't believe it, before I had so
> many troubles building an egcs directly from egcs.cygnus.com.
> 
> A last question, what are the minimal requirements to build egcs under
> pre-R5. Means glibc etc.
> 

If you're willing to wait, I was planning on doing this later this week.

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

Re: egcs-1.1.2-RPM

[Anirudh Joshi]

these were built against glibc2


ftp://linuxppc.slackers.cx/pub/rawhide/ppc/RedHat/RPMS/egcs-1.1.2-8c.ppc.rpm
ftp://linuxppc.slackers.cx/pub/rawhide/ppc/RedHat/RPMS/egcs-c++-1.1.2-8c.ppc.rpm
ftp://linuxppc.slackers.cx/pub/rawhide/ppc/RedHat/RPMS/egcs-g77-1.1.2-8c.ppc.rpm
ftp://linuxppc.slackers.cx/pub/rawhide/ppc/RedHat/RPMS/egcs-objc-1.1.2-8c.ppc.rpm
ftp://linuxppc.slackers.cx/pub/rawhide/ppc/RedHat/RPMS/cpp-1.1.2-8c.ppc.rpm
ftp://linuxppc.slackers.cx/pub/rawhide/ppc/RedHat/RPMS/libstdc++-2.9.0-8c.ppc.rpm

btw, also available: glibc-2.1.1-0a.pre1.ppc.rpm


ani


On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Andreas Tobler wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> maybe a dump question, is anybody working on a RPM for
> egcs-1.1.2-glibc1.99? And or egcs-1.1.2-glibc-2.1.
> If not can I try it by adapting a RPM from a earlier release? I never
> made a RPM from scratch, I only modified them.
> 
> Yesterday, I built egcs-1.1.2 under R4.1. It worked out of the box?! Now
> I have to compare the test results. I can't believe it, before I had so
> many troubles building an egcs directly from egcs.cygnus.com.
> 
> A last question, what are the minimal requirements to build egcs under
> pre-R5. Means glibc etc.
> 
> Thanks
> Andreas
> -- 
> | Andreas Tobler				
> | CH-8004 Zuerich 							
> | E-Mail: andreas.tobler@alcatel.ch	| a.tobler@schweiz.ch
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 


[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]