linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] vfio: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH
       [not found] ` <4-v3-8db96837cdf9+784-vfio_modules_jgg@nvidia.com>
@ 2022-10-18  6:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2022-10-21 19:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2022-10-18  6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe, Russell Currey, Oliver O'Halloran,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Cornelia Huck, linuxppc-dev, kvm

> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE)
>  #include <asm/eeh.h>
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ void vfio_pci_core_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
>  		vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->users--;
>  		mutex_unlock(&vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->lock);
>  	}
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE)

So while this preserves the existing behavior, I wonder if checking
CONFIG_EEH only would make more sense here.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] vfio: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH
  2022-10-18  6:08   ` [PATCH v3 4/5] vfio: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH Christoph Hellwig
@ 2022-10-21 19:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2022-10-21 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: kvm, Alexey Kardashevskiy, Cornelia Huck, Alex Williamson,
	Oliver O'Halloran, linuxppc-dev

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:08:35PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE)
> >  #include <asm/eeh.h>
> >  #endif
> >  
> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ void vfio_pci_core_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
> >  		vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->users--;
> >  		mutex_unlock(&vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->lock);
> >  	}
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH)
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE)
> 
> So while this preserves the existing behavior, I wonder if checking
> CONFIG_EEH only would make more sense here.

Yes, it does read better, done

Thanks,
Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-21 19:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <0-v3-8db96837cdf9+784-vfio_modules_jgg@nvidia.com>
     [not found] ` <4-v3-8db96837cdf9+784-vfio_modules_jgg@nvidia.com>
2022-10-18  6:08   ` [PATCH v3 4/5] vfio: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-21 19:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).