From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92945C433FE for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N2kT81jzJz3gJj for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:02:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=ATzSz2iz; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=mcgrof@infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=ATzSz2iz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N2kS62hghz3gH1 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:01:10 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=1GDFUiaQOnUEwBEjrHMiwUQTpUwTIiBSFbBYYstcP4Y=; b=ATzSz2iz1miGTtiAXaFPJZhr1S 85kvS2VTjM65koeayNKE48R7xTlB/9ooJ25y/M82JyqGPiGzBR1saFvaIKZeDP+txmwCxWNs11b/B oRA0ws0RN6X5yogkPs7nNQYrYXt0IuKdQxdxmR66rZ20ixDFGZztBo2OTegacllOju8DI27roSM+q 3uI0EYnjQUtf6PeX5KPsD5YBaSkqOGs1j7r+O5Nf7GMxpzFNjloYA9/cIdk+zyAgiuaLzMuLftzxN 0N3jvGVNQvQVNBY51WVUt/ftaL+Pqp+TltO9Ku3d/7I0aaKfnZjBFlFCc2EKWtZowVYzgCodRx/Dy BvjwEUJg==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oqNfP-00FFwB-DD; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:01:07 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:01:07 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] powerpc module arch checks Message-ID: References: <20221031120733.3956781-1-npiggin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221031120733.3956781-1-npiggin@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:07:31PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Luis if you would be okay for patch 1 to be merged via powerpc or > prefer to take it in the module tree (or maybe you object to the > code in the first place). Looks good to me, and nothing on my radar which would cause a conflict so happy for you to take it via powerpc or I can take it and apply it right away to tricke / get tested on linux-next by tomorrow. Let me know. Luis