From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05311C433FE for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NClXQ2Khzz3dvN for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 03:21:10 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210105 header.b=ShJChEFk; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=srs0=dvcg=3r=zx2c4.com=jason@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210105 header.b=ShJChEFk; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NClWM26Mcz2yxc for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 03:20:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5411A6219E; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A59CEC433B5; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="ShJChEFk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1668702005; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yXReeGYWAkNsw4+UICMYAUFCUliJi8syMU+jrBjtN+I=; b=ShJChEFkS/WoLTYTfqnIoulaJEVDjPgHlBF73vJKzecwUuNaBWaxad+1izxyXu6Exw/TaA 5irR4sihjVzoDK1KiXvBd2OBPvvMwotSdLzvfkIJeE7XNMY72JeeG28zUlT5pyaHmBsZk0 JQ9ybm2sWtI6GOjvOwFIenKMBQ/9L7c= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id d3e36533 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:19:52 +0100 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_between() when possible Message-ID: References: <20221114164558.1180362-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20221114164558.1180362-4-Jason@zx2c4.com> <202211161436.A45AD719A@keescook> <202211161628.164F47F@keescook> <0EE39896-C7B6-4CB6-87D5-22AA787740A9@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kees Cook , "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , ydroneaud@opteya.com, Herbert Xu , Richard Weinberger , Helge Deller , Russell King , Jason Gunthorpe , Catalin Marinas , Jakub Kicinski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , Heiko Carstens , Jani Nikula , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Jaegeuk Kim , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, SeongJae Park , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Christoph =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6hmwalder?= , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Sakari Ailus , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:42:37AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 04:47:27PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> > - between > > >> > - ranged > > >> > - spanning > > >> > > > >> > https://www.thefreedictionary.com/List-of-prepositions.htm > > >> > - amid > > >> > > > >> > Sigh, names. > > >> > > >> I think "inclusive" is best. > > > > > >I find it not very descriptive of what the function does. Is there one > > >you like second best? Or are you convinced they're all much much much > > >worse than "inclusive" that they shouldn't be considered? > > > > Right, I don't think any are sufficiently descriptive. "Incluisve" > > with two arguments seems unambiguous and complete to me. :) > > The problem with "between", "ranged", "spanning" is that they don't > tell the reader whether we're dealing with an "open interval" or a > "closed interval". They are just different ways of saying that it's a > range between, say, 0 and 20. But it doesn't tell you whether it > includes 0 or 20 or not. > > The only way I can see for making it ambiguous is either to use the > terminology "closed interval" or "inclusive". And "open" and "closed" > can have other meanings, so get_random_u32_inclusive() is going to be > less confusing than get_random_u32_closed(). Alright, that about settles it then. I'll re-roll. Jason