From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FB8C433C1 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48166617ED for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:49:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 48166617ED Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F89pX523Zz30Hb for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 22:49:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=UWtdSj5j; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=UWtdSj5j; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F89p64DBtz2yZ0 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 22:48:45 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7B6B6195B; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:48:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1617018522; bh=7bOjh2VBV6ORFq+hCMAwT1T3XPaqoe4QhuhPDGs1AAs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UWtdSj5jytB4yinCTIl3uubMK3m15sgaJtDCKH4UDmRTzMxypBr8y8V81cmTfFm0M srtX9TghLWGx+Ep76clREiLK59I/9LFZrkw/NAqR/q5/Bwjvxm3c5aV4hyPSPoQTJo xfqlBmY7r+HQbjNRQKB/IDAmJg0CoWggrzQOzLDE= Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:48:39 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Bhaskar Chowdhury , Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dave.jiang@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] DMA: Mundane typo fixes Message-ID: References: <20210329052910.GB26495@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:25:11AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > On 07:29 Mon 29 Mar 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I really don't think these typo patchbomb are that useful. I'm all > > for fixing typos when working with a subsystem, but I'm not sure these > > patchbombs help anything. > > > I am sure you are holding the wrong end of the wand and grossly failing to > understand. Please stop statements like this, it is not helpful and is doing nothing but ensure that your patches will not be looked at in the future. > Anyway, I hope I give a heads up ...find "your way" to fix those damn > thing...it's glaring.... There is no requirement that anyone accept patches that are sent to them. When you complain when receiving comments on them, that shows you do not wish to work with others. Sorry, but you are now on my local blacklist for a while, and I encourage other maintainers to just ignore these patches as well. thanks, greg k-h