From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D70C433B4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 04:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD098613F9 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 04:37:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AD098613F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDvs95kJ9z30GV for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:37:49 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=ozlabs.org header.i=@ozlabs.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201707 header.b=E6H8JPGe; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=203.11.71.1; helo=ozlabs.org; envelope-from=paulus@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=ozlabs.org header.i=@ozlabs.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201707 header.b=E6H8JPGe; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FDvrm1zpfz2xYv for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:37:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 4FDvrk4nhlz9sWQ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:37:26 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1617683846; bh=VZuzCILOIRol37URhiobWfkupK9ny+NNPs7jOctkUWc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E6H8JPGeVXPRjLNkwWre49EODd8kqB8Y1GbQLw8uoJubll2G0oKHugO6gjR420zuZ A8lFrrhfVlaBTW17mjapYpSucVuRgUzQAjIlSNr5+/aniZDfZ1rV+emkzVmkvgMqgs cwBVUKbJj42ewMvfEscpRhRi6ZyhE8rGuptvXD83VTtZgkMHTkG15f7r2PuMf/Bezt r2sYZec50+KkIwdCAjfvZ0UTC3fEgnfSM7kWndzzPedy0I0BLHchmBirANX2xkFfvE P2C0NoRyqgx0wd6KctnL8f03bFQ4wtu5fv6gPPykZxf7F547aVos3vol0Hb+Uvir1p cdENlc3Ky/hCQ== Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:37:22 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 16/48] KVM: PPC: Book3S 64: Move interrupt early register setup to KVM Message-ID: References: <20210405011948.675354-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20210405011948.675354-17-npiggin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210405011948.675354-17-npiggin@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 11:19:16AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Like the earlier patch for hcalls, KVM interrupt entry requires a > different calling convention than the Linux interrupt handlers > set up. Move the code that converts from one to the other into KVM. I don't see where you do anything to enable the new KVM entry code to access the PACA_EXSLB area when handling DSegI and ISegI interrupts. Have I missed something, or are you not testing PR KVM at all? Paul.