From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC67C433ED for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DFB061104 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:25:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0DFB061104 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atmark-techno.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNxdB4mhyz3c9M for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:25:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=atmark-techno.com (client-ip=13.115.124.170; helo=gw.atmark-techno.com; envelope-from=dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com; receiver=) Received: from gw.atmark-techno.com (gw.atmark-techno.com [13.115.124.170]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNvpS1PZ4z2ypn for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:03:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ua1-f69.google.com (mail-ua1-f69.google.com [209.85.222.69]) by gw.atmark-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3688048F for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:03:11 +0900 (JST) Received: by mail-ua1-f69.google.com with SMTP id u3-20020ab069c30000b02901ebe1c8da33so1688944uaq.7 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 22:03:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=bLr973ENjFZQNNz5/z+BmoCFuTDVovYaAYguOO0YOc4=; b=n+LpgNbIx6wos1mpiFQV/gxXHiNB9iNy5LfOnGXj4iEnlOazmsg3bkJMqOVCgB59iS /7VNgJ4qt0oPdfvmLbXBB5rhjZuAbJeswuQmcduCDJwG9iiOsdA+0DxTExaJHGIf8n+W hWQVk+WZLjWFngwYyD0IrWQFhdc0fDdBYdMQpy0huB4oPr8CM4qJM+NNq//zWfkG74xQ gnrdQowhdi/Z2C3gXpg11ID7LnAKAXksLb9iqfQ2xmegwSJU9G3cxO/z1KhtN2vOd1H2 U+9UUXUbg6NPwmTnBKTAZVuewbR2Z4xyx2/fSbvCalfZYzu6ezYCHTGWIGfUnJ3KPDNy 7/uA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hv4XfRJjvqtHa591J8GJ+EK+RyQsrTa8uXyA+eOQsLq18QwRn I+3OC5roH+v4vU1gBbkVMoA7lQr7CwNjCQd207khTPOIGFAZ3cfrc246q8S/S0dK4DXKCoLnOmW 2oYkpxuSUculQLhEsE3Z9pWqMW7dWJg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d645:b029:e8:ec90:d097 with SMTP id y5-20020a170902d645b02900e8ec90d097mr21074827plh.47.1618808579511; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 22:02:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyI1MeNQhpXnytM5xmVsw3ZCkrTxMPyrxhKroAVtmGUaPe01xpWL31HOX4hl1pxmvtORo+KDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d645:b029:e8:ec90:d097 with SMTP id y5-20020a170902d645b02900e8ec90d097mr21074765plh.47.1618808579243; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 22:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc-0115 (103.131.189.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.189.131.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ga21sm2553351pjb.5.2021.04.18.22.02.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Apr 2021 22:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from martinet by pc-0115 with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lYM3l-0016Ra-6N; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:02:57 +0900 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:02:47 +0900 From: Dominique MARTINET To: "Alice Guo (OSS)" Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 3/3] driver: update all the code that use soc_device_match Message-ID: References: <20210419042722.27554-1-alice.guo@oss.nxp.com> <20210419042722.27554-4-alice.guo@oss.nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210419042722.27554-4-alice.guo@oss.nxp.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:21:18 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, aymen.sghaier@nxp.com, geert+renesas@glider.be, rafael@kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, mturquette@baylibre.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.hajda@samsung.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, horia.geanta@nxp.com, khilman@baylibre.com, joro@8bytes.org, narmstrong@baylibre.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com, kishon@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, kuba@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux@roeck-us.net, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Roy.Pledge@nxp.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, edubezval@gmail.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, ssantosh@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, mchehab@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, balbi@kernel.org, tomba@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, robert.foss@linaro.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, linux@prisktech.co.nz, vkoul@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, j-keerthy@ti.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, jyri.sarha@iki.fi, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Alice Guo (OSS) wrote on Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:27:22PM +0800: > From: Alice Guo > > Update all the code that use soc_device_match A single patch might be difficult to accept for all components, a each maintainer will probably want to have a say on their subsystem? I would suggest to split these for a non-RFC version; a this will really need to be case-by-case handling. > because add support for soc_device_match returning -EPROBE_DEFER. (English does not parse here for me) I've only commented a couple of places in the code itself, but this doesn't seem to add much support for errors, just sweep the problem under the rug. > Signed-off-by: Alice Guo > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c > index 5fae60f8c135..00c59aa217c1 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c > @@ -2909,7 +2909,7 @@ static int sysc_init_soc(struct sysc *ddata) > } > > match = soc_device_match(sysc_soc_feat_match); > - if (!match) > + if (!match || IS_ERR(match)) > return 0; This function handles errors, I would recommend returning the error as is if soc_device_match returned one so the probe can be retried later. > > if (match->data) > diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/r8a7795-cpg-mssr.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/r8a7795-cpg-mssr.c > index c32d2c678046..90a18336a4c3 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/r8a7795-cpg-mssr.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/r8a7795-cpg-mssr.c > @@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static const unsigned int r8a7795es2_mod_nullify[] __initconst = { > > static int __init r8a7795_cpg_mssr_init(struct device *dev) > { > + const struct soc_device_attribute *match; > const struct rcar_gen3_cpg_pll_config *cpg_pll_config; > u32 cpg_mode; > int error; > @@ -453,7 +454,8 @@ static int __init r8a7795_cpg_mssr_init(struct device *dev) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (soc_device_match(r8a7795es1)) { > + match = soc_device_match(r8a7795es1); > + if (!IS_ERR(match) && match) { Same, return the error. Assuming an error means no match will just lead to hard to debug problems because the driver potentially assumed the wrong device when it's just not ready yet. > cpg_core_nullify_range(r8a7795_core_clks, > ARRAY_SIZE(r8a7795_core_clks), > R8A7795_CLK_S0D2, R8A7795_CLK_S0D12); > [...] > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c > index eaaec0a55cc6..13a06b613379 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c > @@ -757,17 +757,20 @@ static const char * const devices_allowlist[] = { > > static bool ipmmu_device_is_allowed(struct device *dev) > { > + const struct soc_device_attribute *match1, *match2; > unsigned int i; > > /* > * R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2 use the allow list to opt-in devices. > * For Other SoCs, this returns true anyway. > */ > - if (!soc_device_match(soc_needs_opt_in)) > + match1 = soc_device_match(soc_needs_opt_in); > + if (!IS_ERR(match1) && !match1) I'm not sure what you intended to do, but !match1 already means there is no error so the original code is identical. In this case ipmmu_device_is_allowed does not allow errors so this is one of the "difficult" drivers that require slightly more thinking. It is only called in ipmmu_of_xlate which does return errors properly, so in this case the most straightforward approach would be to make ipmmu_device_is_allowed return an int and forward errors as well. ... This is going to need quite some more work to be acceptable, in my opinion, but I think it should be possible. Thanks, -- Dominique