From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893D3C48BCD for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 06:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC04B613AD for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 06:52:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EC04B613AD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G0HqQ48L4z3by7 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:52:50 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=R3Ua7SSr; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=rppt@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=R3Ua7SSr; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G0Hpx241Wz2yx9 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:52:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F40D661249; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 06:52:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1623221541; bh=1NOcR9X1qrsVWC8pZ+WOBsJYlerWmKCJZFjAHZSyi1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=R3Ua7SSrAmPcigjQENQSeeEMj920XMPbd0mRAH+B4DHPNXP+taIOYwYUWcVIXb5j6 VJBySmzsOYZnbE6P4kMoE9ZvUpFBLiddGWhEYtU+E0KEUzEdWHkJqeLVtgBH6jO4C9 Pe9x2UVR5RoSXUB4d6262LpkrrGlAOAE5RSKB4ZbL931VU3fcHDPQIgBFXazdDNmx0 KYGm7I3vStPQPXah/NfmgtdSVOkJw8ewGPxvh3kYk2hvG8vZe26iLuJ3PqURc/rI07 p6tkwWjdfIcQ6IB7Wn8wiS2wG0e2oDGZCpnQAvL+zgWVSStPrtFhj2bz5Vv7w2pP3G OCNYfrxKsGSKw== Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:52:08 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] mm: replace CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES with CONFIG_NUMA Message-ID: References: <20210608091316.3622-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20210608091316.3622-9-rppt@kernel.org> <20210608172544.d9bf17549565d866fbb18451@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210608172544.d9bf17549565d866fbb18451@linux-foundation.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport , Geert Uytterhoeven , Matt Turner , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann , Ivan Kokshaysky , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Richard Henderson , Vineet Gupta , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:25:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:13:15 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > After removal of DISCINTIGMEM the NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES and NUMA > > configuration options are equivalent. > > > > Drop CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES and use CONFIG_NUMA instead. > > > > Done with > > > > $ sed -i 's/CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES/CONFIG_NUMA/' \ > > $(git grep -wl CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES) > > $ sed -i 's/NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES/NUMA/' \ > > $(git grep -wl NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES) > > > > with manual tweaks afterwards. > > > > ... > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h > > @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ extern int movable_zone; > > #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM > > static inline int zone_movable_is_highmem(void) > > { > > -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > > return movable_zone == ZONE_HIGHMEM; > > #else > > return (ZONE_MOVABLE - 1) == ZONE_HIGHMEM; > > I dropped this hunk - your "mm/mmzone.h: simplify is_highmem_idx()" > removed zone_movable_is_highmem(). Ah, right. Thanks! -- Sincerely yours, Mike.