From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] powerpc/pseries: rename distance_ref_points_depth to max_domain_index
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:01:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMgYCwpQ+rzkZ8tx@yekko> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210614164003.196094-3-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3960 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:09:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> No functional change in this patch
As with 1/8 an explanation of what this actually means and therefore
why this is a better name would be very helpful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index 8365b298ec48..5941da201fa3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int n_mem_addr_cells, n_mem_size_cells;
> static int form1_affinity;
>
> #define MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS 4
> -static int distance_ref_points_depth;
> +static int max_domain_index;
> static const __be32 *distance_ref_points;
> static int distance_lookup_table[MAX_NUMNODES][MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS];
>
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int cpu_distance(__be32 *cpu1_assoc, __be32 *cpu2_assoc)
>
> int i, index;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < distance_ref_points_depth; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < max_domain_index; i++) {
> index = be32_to_cpu(distance_ref_points[i]);
> if (cpu1_assoc[index] == cpu2_assoc[index])
> break;
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ int __node_distance(int a, int b)
> if (!form1_affinity)
> return ((a == b) ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < distance_ref_points_depth; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < max_domain_index; i++) {
> if (distance_lookup_table[a][i] == distance_lookup_table[b][i])
> break;
>
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void initialize_distance_lookup_table(int nid,
> if (!form1_affinity)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < distance_ref_points_depth; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < max_domain_index; i++) {
> const __be32 *entry;
>
> entry = &associativity[be32_to_cpu(distance_ref_points[i]) - 1];
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int associativity_to_nid(const __be32 *associativity)
> nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>
> if (nid > 0 &&
> - of_read_number(associativity, 1) >= distance_ref_points_depth) {
> + of_read_number(associativity, 1) >= max_domain_index) {
> /*
> * Skip the length field and send start of associativity array
> */
> @@ -310,14 +310,14 @@ static int __init find_primary_domain_index(void)
> */
> distance_ref_points = of_get_property(root,
> "ibm,associativity-reference-points",
> - &distance_ref_points_depth);
> + &max_domain_index);
>
> if (!distance_ref_points) {
> dbg("NUMA: ibm,associativity-reference-points not found.\n");
> goto err;
> }
>
> - distance_ref_points_depth /= sizeof(int);
> + max_domain_index /= sizeof(int);
>
> if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_OPAL) ||
> firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_TYPE1_AFFINITY)) {
> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int __init find_primary_domain_index(void)
> if (form1_affinity) {
> index = of_read_number(distance_ref_points, 1);
> } else {
> - if (distance_ref_points_depth < 2) {
> + if (max_domain_index < 2) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA: "
> "short ibm,associativity-reference-points\n");
> goto err;
> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ static int __init find_primary_domain_index(void)
> * Warn and cap if the hardware supports more than
> * MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS domains.
> */
> - if (distance_ref_points_depth > MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS) {
> + if (max_domain_index > MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA: distance array capped at "
> "%d entries\n", MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS);
> - distance_ref_points_depth = MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS;
> + max_domain_index = MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS;
> }
>
> of_node_put(root);
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 16:39 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Add support for FORM2 associativity Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-14 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] powerpc/pseries: rename min_common_depth to primary_domain_index Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 3:00 ` David Gibson
2021-06-15 8:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-14 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] powerpc/pseries: rename distance_ref_points_depth to max_domain_index Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 3:01 ` David Gibson [this message]
2021-06-15 8:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-14 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] powerpc/pseries: Rename TYPE1_AFFINITY to FORM1_AFFINITY Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 3:04 ` David Gibson
2021-06-14 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] powerpc/pseries: Consolidate DLPAR NUMA distance update Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 3:13 ` David Gibson
2021-06-15 8:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-14 16:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] powerpc/pseries: Consolidate NUMA distance update during boot Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-14 16:40 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] powerpc/pseries: Add a helper for form1 cpu distance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 3:21 ` David Gibson
2021-06-14 16:40 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] powerpc/pseries: Add support for FORM2 associativity Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 3:53 ` David Gibson
2021-06-15 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 6:25 ` David Gibson
2021-06-15 7:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-17 7:50 ` David Gibson
2021-06-17 10:46 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-14 16:40 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] powerpc/papr_scm: Use FORM2 associativity details Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 3:55 ` David Gibson
2021-06-15 5:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 6:34 ` David Gibson
2021-06-15 7:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-17 7:46 ` David Gibson
2021-06-17 10:53 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-06-17 11:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-17 11:46 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-17 20:00 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-06-18 3:18 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-17 10:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-24 3:16 ` David Gibson
2021-06-17 13:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-17 14:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-15 1:47 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Add support for FORM2 associativity Daniel Henrique Barboza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMgYCwpQ+rzkZ8tx@yekko \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).