From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: farosas@linux.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
npiggin@gmail.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for H_RPT_INVALIDATE
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:59:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOZ/FNW1K/nzaaEe@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOZ3zNsGbSoymVKI@yekko>
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 01:58:04PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:56:32AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:42:33PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:20:00PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> > > > index 4bc45d3ed8b0..b44f291fc909 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> > > > @@ -124,8 +124,17 @@ static inline bool need_extra_context(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea)
> > > >
> > > > #if defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU)
> > > > extern void radix_kvm_prefetch_workaround(struct mm_struct *mm);
> > > > +void do_h_rpt_invalidate_prt(unsigned long pid, unsigned long lpid,
> > > > + unsigned long type, unsigned long pg_sizes,
> > > > + unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> > > > #else
> > > > static inline void radix_kvm_prefetch_workaround(struct mm_struct *mm) { }
> > > > +static inline void do_h_rpt_invalidate_prt(unsigned long pid,
> > > > + unsigned long lpid,
> > > > + unsigned long type,
> > > > + unsigned long pg_sizes,
> > > > + unsigned long start,
> > > > + unsigned long end) { }
> > >
> > > Since the only plausible caller is in KVM HV code, why do you need the
> > > #else clause.
> >
> > The call to the above routine is prevented for non-radix guests
> > in KVM HV code at runtime using kvm_is_radix() check and not by
> > CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU. Hence the #else version would be needed.
>
> kvm_is_radix() should evaluate to false at compile time if
> !defined(CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU), in which case, no you shouldn't need
> the else version.
At least in the latest mainline, I don't see the definition of
kvm_is_radix() being conditional to CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU.
Anyway this is what I see in practice if the #else version is
removed and CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU is turned off:
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c: In function ‘kvmppc_h_rpt_invalidate’:
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c:983:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_h_rpt_invalidate_prt’; did you mean ‘do_h_rpt_invalidate_pat’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
983 | do_h_rpt_invalidate_prt(id, vcpu->kvm->arch.lpid,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| do_h_rpt_invalidate_pat
Regards,
Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-21 8:49 [PATCH v8 0/6] Support for H_RPT_INVALIDATE in PowerPC KVM Bharata B Rao
2021-06-21 8:49 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix comments of H_RPT_INVALIDATE arguments Bharata B Rao
2021-06-21 8:49 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] powerpc/book3s64/radix: Add H_RPT_INVALIDATE pgsize encodings to mmu_psize_def Bharata B Rao
2021-06-21 8:50 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for H_RPT_INVALIDATE Bharata B Rao
2021-07-05 4:42 ` David Gibson
2021-07-06 5:26 ` Bharata B Rao
2021-07-08 3:58 ` David Gibson
2021-07-08 4:29 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2021-07-12 2:28 ` David Gibson
2021-06-21 8:50 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Nested support in H_RPT_INVALIDATE Bharata B Rao
2021-06-21 17:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-22 4:35 ` Bharata B Rao
2021-06-22 7:12 ` Bharata B Rao
2021-06-23 6:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-21 8:50 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add KVM_CAP_PPC_RPT_INVALIDATE capability Bharata B Rao
2021-06-21 8:50 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use H_RPT_INVALIDATE in nested KVM Bharata B Rao
2021-06-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Support for H_RPT_INVALIDATE in PowerPC KVM Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YOZ/FNW1K/nzaaEe@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).