From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01C8C433EF for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 20:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E9B61131 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 20:44:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 47E9B61131 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HPmfS5GzZz2ywp for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 07:44:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=QT+moIpp; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030; helo=mail-pj1-x1030.google.com; envelope-from=shorne@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=QT+moIpp; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HPmdj2fGyz2ygF for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 07:44:07 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id pf6-20020a17090b1d8600b0019fa884ab85so5310569pjb.5 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uukXjZUQ/w+EOWxXqSK1+sdvRdmpSRZkmYypGawzIsM=; b=QT+moIpptwRsvjJhH6SoVjzQTZZ76DE7Nw9kqS29J/CEKIqSBkKNAPsy0jT6+cMT5r 0B+0+QxpzmLLa3r7jEXnwxbIQgJkwMi/us4S+81A070jhHgCr7uQ+fbqDmEae7tJyZrW KXcNV8SnxYIgrHqlro0WODjOtXLW8X88ZHdiubGxyQ6s4VSefvMST/UT52GjNmBirP7J vPJrn4/h0HeMwFA9oFdn+ECv8WDQE4jLb4GwOzBBu4isPwb9sn2ye3J8U1vaLKqwIt6z g4sBC+3kK0eokeo5x1JO49TmdiQsp14FxekFKZ6n9Z+Jk+BJ4arhTM0CkIcl8c56mqWF a5Sw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uukXjZUQ/w+EOWxXqSK1+sdvRdmpSRZkmYypGawzIsM=; b=OUavWcVhZHJDfc59z/E2hDgXVvzUuGJMaN1QHZnEHGoojAyJK95PAOIzXf38V2u7mp 2FLNZrgEgdiXf6Qk4WQ1GGuwVwIV76DFFC1mAvMPTG7CYsXHvToquYlBPDf5m0A5zePD ZpyzQ/nVpXp/Htdqw2k1oBUimUFFxWuoynYJ9Cey5hGZdwS8h10McjKfghXW1Q2EHd8H Ycd29G0UEVdbJBZeH518aGR4vLwT1E4EokzhE7zZihSnR9U3D0/FvrXn1zfaBRZOsiZa HaDe2PTpKl0Wxue5bIIjlL88ySTecMhIPT8eRPXUzjFRPx7WriZGSRQt+bzSBSxeIbT1 jh3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532s/fAz3Tam9mLRbXxZiFSYv665xZMyF6mWDDQ7O49Og7+5KbiA KgliOu7gLa+MfvWg/nEXNjE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbN+u6234S13N4970pWpeBYhU6hjO3nALy/nZjNDvGJdvqZ+ABgTpyG64/0LL2Z6QM8DUU9w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bb81:b0:12d:a7ec:3d85 with SMTP id m1-20020a170902bb8100b0012da7ec3d85mr328965pls.17.1633553043180; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2409:10:24a0:4700:e8ad:216a:2a9d:6d0c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q8sm5806904pja.52.2021.10.06.13.44.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 05:44:00 +0900 From: Stafford Horne To: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] openrisc: Use of_get_cpu_hwid() Message-ID: References: <20211006164332.1981454-1-robh@kernel.org> <20211006164332.1981454-7-robh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211006164332.1981454-7-robh@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , Jonas Bonn , Florian Fainelli , Yoshinori Sato , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Russell King , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Catalin Marinas , Palmer Dabbelt , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou , Ray Jui , Stefan Kristiansson , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Borislav Petkov , Paul Walmsley , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Scott Branden , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Frank Rowand , James Morse , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 11:43:26AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Replace open coded parsing of CPU nodes' 'reg' property with > of_get_cpu_hwid(). > > Cc: Jonas Bonn > Cc: Stefan Kristiansson > Cc: Stafford Horne > Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > --- > arch/openrisc/kernel/smp.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/smp.c > index 415e209732a3..7d5a4f303a5a 100644 > --- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/smp.c > +++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/smp.c > @@ -65,11 +65,7 @@ void __init smp_init_cpus(void) > u32 cpu_id; > > for_each_of_cpu_node(cpu) { > - if (of_property_read_u32(cpu, "reg", &cpu_id)) { > - pr_warn("%s missing reg property", cpu->full_name); > - continue; > - } > - > + cpu_id = of_get_cpu_hwid(cpu); You have defined of_get_cpu_hwid to return u64, will this create compiler warnings when since we are storing a u64 into a u32? It seems only if we make with W=3. I thought we usually warned on this. Oh well, for the openrisc bits. Acked-by: Stafford Horne > if (cpu_id < NR_CPUS) > set_cpu_possible(cpu_id, true); > } > -- > 2.30.2 >