From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158B2C433F5 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69F64611CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:41:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 69F64611CE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HJtHK4kvmz2yp0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:41:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=K5Ca7t9h; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de (client-ip=5.9.137.197; helo=mail.skyhub.de; envelope-from=bp@alien8.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=K5Ca7t9h; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HJtGd3HkLz307W for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:40:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f13b200371079131a9f19c8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f13:b200:3710:7913:1a9f:19c8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 185C51EC06C1; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 23:40:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1632865234; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=3zAlBZi1O1Z7iGiOtlzR59oObKF3oTwf3vRM6tWoLcY=; b=K5Ca7t9hqqMM2deF0li2lbysEHXsHTs91GSL2ZqKLhzfX9w19AiIGCNaZ3Y63sCu3hsepG fIbQEa5D8HQEE2RRoDDCLkqS/Fxfaghkv3CiOoHYu4QVTSTfUfcSzUHkFkeeRHlHYg9afU kuT2sPlWmWHkAbKxJ37GJ775LHgIgQc= Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 23:40:28 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function Message-ID: References: <20210928191009.32551-1-bp@alien8.de> <80593893-c63b-d481-45f1-42a3a6fd762a@linux.intel.com> <7319b756-55dc-c4d1-baf6-4686f0156ac4@linux.intel.com> <695a3bf6-5382-68df-3ab5-8841b777fca2@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <695a3bf6-5382-68df-3ab5-8841b777fca2@linux.intel.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Baoquan He , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Christian Borntraeger , VMware Graphics , Dave Young , Tom Lendacky , Thomas Zimmermann , Vasily Gorbik , Heiko Carstens , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Andy Lutomirski , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , kexec@lists.infradead.org, LKML , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Daniel Vetter , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: > Yes. But, since the check is related to TDX, I just want to confirm whether > you are fine with naming the function as intel_*(). Why is this such a big of a deal?! There's amd_cc_platform_has() and intel_cc_platform_has() will be the corresponding Intel version. > Since this patch is going to have dependency on TDX code, I will include > this patch in TDX patch set. Ok. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette