From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61E8C433F5 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691E760E8B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:38:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 691E760E8B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HSYd84n4kz2yZf for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:38:20 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=i59HQEsR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=wsa@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=i59HQEsR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HSYcR4dp9z2yJT for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:37:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D06360EDF; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:37:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1633945061; bh=YyuuSg4+Xw1WBeodqUV8qTEhir5tsvWm6bEneSlHOmM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=i59HQEsRw6XeL+wWM/VpKT61n1VUj0RezFOCjc+1AthZno/w4EKiQ4PAZfRzpXHbs rRtiFU/s5A2ARGgjZqjyUtCPpPmvI7itUB8+OIkU69WuIAbfy6uYeC/NzCvk0WRrQN Z3xsGY1KDeSChYzBHmLDiFnJG6I14FlxtXTV57f3XxFvj5mqCevNecNIqdbBq2LdJo 5REpks8Dc6RbBI0lCZE9EGHhPL4YGrBAGb+qCtVqFszz0ycd76ybGzMPwrfwDLCaZy eIWNHd2cCloOSxOhnhPsp2XpAniAjsWuvMcU/feK35TSsS070j7U2Vuoy6LwcEl8hf WFrunQPR7oIWQ== Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:37:36 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Hector Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driver Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Hector Martin , Sven Peter , Christian Zigotzky , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Mohamed Mediouni , Stan Skowronek , Mark Kettenis , Alyssa Rosenzweig , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "R.T.Dickinson" , Matthew Leaman , Darren Stevens References: <20211008163532.75569-1-sven@svenpeter.dev> <8a8afc73-3756-a305-ce5f-70b4bce6999f@xenosoft.de> <11d8f784-c90a-4e6c-9abd-564cb5241cb7@www.fastmail.com> <5ae30425-d6d4-5688-36e3-58cc6c6ff264@marcan.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5TP+rHLVHtolMC1P" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5ae30425-d6d4-5688-36e3-58cc6c6ff264@marcan.st> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Darren Stevens , Arnd Bergmann , Sven Peter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christian Zigotzky , Olof Johansson , Mohamed Mediouni , "R.T.Dickinson" , Mark Kettenis , linuxppc-dev , Matthew Leaman , Alyssa Rosenzweig , Stan Skowronek Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --5TP+rHLVHtolMC1P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Because MAINTAINER dependencies can be a bit nasty, I suggest I drop the > > MAINTAINER additions for now and we add them later. Then, you can add > > the pasemi-core as well. D'accord? > >=20 >=20 > We can just split the MAINTAINERS changes into a separate patch and I can > push that one through the SoC tree, along with other MAINTAINERS updates. > Does that work for everyone? That would also work for me. Thank you! --5TP+rHLVHtolMC1P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmFkBdwACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYFeRAAn3V00WXZcUzFlKUIvdYT0C7Yni7P6e8BRdY0CYPcLdAQdT588ZDnztXb F1+gVrKcGjcSW0PH9Poor5cE1bH3BtCWl3bM0lVC3QXPSLEA23ZjO/WA+mWDLnNM y08LX6qn0jNDSf7MEgWCkKA7gpYTmxwZr4+hanflNHp2V+imR1vp803p59rSpX4+ ZO+bm4HBy3A0VvTU26uzIbOJgpn5cO9vdZ6bLdw4Q6CdYmr1rq3p0mytsPEnnIOz gDuacJ9HwN3xmRa1cdMhXOKTgdryn6ZAEqyfaW5rgiM2dL9ZTumEUkJyHXcc1sMS QQqvQnY3zzhyLyEJsLPLMJnQQHGwUyMFX4D5R54tO1s0ne6iNIcOdWMsfAcrOb8b YWaikNAw3oQ392V6g/iXPUfMppY9O1f47gZkLMHuHZV5XusPm84qyYIlysgyyf3d Qwg5nFywlOFxYtySkxfje/OLREkzZoVOQXaxi/kC3IQiWDtoxU9NYMu7blXrJa71 /kEe4lftTRBKib/iRahLb0ZOOiBI2Zpd0IiY3z5/Edhp9TY4akDHFOBOGZ66p8Af P/3TDcr7XZ/10fBZA/2biB4a5/hVKbnUTMBkXjqhNYN4lQA4VbuFB4+KvXJXrf4y Lsy0yB+hE2CIa7sRFrjGBPjPZTjvuYg1VONj3P/VUS4KDw02Uss= =z66C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5TP+rHLVHtolMC1P--