From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC40FC433F5 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D068F60F92 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:29:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D068F60F92 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HT9NN6GJYz2ynd for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:29:24 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=Af/9zwXN; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=Af/9zwXN; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HT9Mb2xGhz2xs3 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:28:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E16360F92; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:28:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1634030919; bh=w6tJ0j7GZyF9EA8+IbdyJH2ct/ziottLxIdQqKTGRqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Af/9zwXNiRPkvFTna55wceL8kexV3DRj4NlW8pN/pyovPyCs5nA2v/56fiiRDIU+c HM3Yu00NmTQF5P/KOHjXwMKD/VP0O/X3b0SCsoNdDpQFnkr/DDBxo1KFcNTaVuCVAK CleWg31dMcxiLmuLVt6pU/08nVbn/1ukk2C4m0v8= Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:28:36 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/52] 5.4.153-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20211012064436.577746139@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Florian Fainelli , bpf , Johan Almbladh , Pavel Machek , linuxppc-dev , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Jon Hunter , Linus Torvalds , linux-stable , patches@kernelci.org, Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , "Naveen N. Rao" , Guenter Roeck Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:04:54PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 12:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.153 release. > > There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:44:25 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.153-rc2.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > stable rc 5.4.153-rc2 Powerpc build failed. > > In file included from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h:11, > from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:19: > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c: In function 'bpf_jit_build_body': > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h:32:9: error: expected expression before 'do' > 32 | do { if (d) { (d)[idx] = instr; } idx++; } while (0) > | ^~ > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h:33:33: note: in expansion of macro 'PLANT_INSTR' > 33 | #define EMIT(instr) PLANT_INSTR(image, ctx->idx, instr) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:415:41: note: in expansion of macro 'EMIT' > 415 | EMIT(PPC_LI(dst_reg, 0)); > | ^~~~ > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h:33:33: note: in expansion of macro 'PLANT_INSTR' > 33 | #define EMIT(instr) PLANT_INSTR(image, ctx->idx, instr) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h:41:33: note: in expansion of macro 'EMIT' > 41 | #define PPC_ADDI(d, a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_ADDI | > ___PPC_RT(d) | \ > | ^~~~ > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h:44:33: note: in expansion of macro 'PPC_ADDI' > 44 | #define PPC_LI(r, i) PPC_ADDI(r, 0, i) > | ^~~~~~~~ > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:415:46: note: in expansion of macro 'PPC_LI' > 415 | EMIT(PPC_LI(dst_reg, 0)); > | ^~~~~~ > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:262: > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.o] Error 1 > make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors. > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Ok, I'm just going to go delete this patch from the queue now... Thanks for the quick report. greg k-h