From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8926CC433EF for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B641561038 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:57:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org B641561038 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HgnBZ6wn1z3cNS for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 02:57:42 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=134.134.136.31; helo=mga06.intel.com; envelope-from=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HgnB74zGWz2xF5 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 02:57:18 +1100 (AEDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10151"; a="291526977" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,193,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="291526977" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2021 08:56:15 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,193,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="448407220" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.184]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2021 08:56:13 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1mgUEV-0024Em-3w; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0300 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 18:55:54 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions Message-ID: References: <20211027153354.81129-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211027153354.81129-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paul Mackerras Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:33:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > When kernel.h is used in the headers it adds a lot into dependency hell, > especially when there are circular dependencies are involved. > > Replace kernel.h inclusion with the list of what is really being used. Seems nobody from PPC took this patch. Any idea who can take it? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko