From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E90C433F5 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J7XV66LGgz3cbb for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 18:48:30 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=Pb/dyynX; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=145.40.68.75; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=Pb/dyynX; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J7XSq1LCHz3dg1 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 18:47:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5E6B816D5; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF933C341C1; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:47:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1638863239; bh=S3bXluwk9Tp0/I7fDZuveLkWCavppG21+XUHrjKqzHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Pb/dyynXP59dAMHIuj0t8HKLgqvn8JROVWdSIIIKJ5NiyoFtkSERH47W84UjiwAXs MWu0388me7wEsfFLd9qgqWiW6piHnLwSP52fOwKGGYOy/OwLdXwUJVoGnJm7L14wxN BPRnkCaul1K9TxSg+lXuERdjdsH74dOh8QaEwz0s= Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 08:47:16 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch V2 20/23] PCI/MSI: Move msi_lock to struct pci_dev Message-ID: References: <20211206210147.872865823@linutronix.de> <20211206210224.925241961@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211206210224.925241961@linutronix.de> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Wei Liu , Ashok Raj , x86@kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , Bjorn Helgaas , Megha Dey , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Kevin Tian , Heiko Carstens , Alex Williamson , Cedric Le Goater , Kalle Valo , Juergen Gross , Thomas Bogendoerfer , LKML , Marc Zygnier , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:27:56PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > It's only required for PCI/MSI. So no point in having it in every struct > device. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Yes!!! Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman