From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
"live-patching@vger.kernel.org" <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] powerpc/module_32: Fix livepatching for RO modules
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:44:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdSjlgflqKi6Raof@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5697157cb7dba3927e19aa17c915a83bc550bb2.1640017960.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 04:38:09PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Livepatching a loaded module involves applying relocations through
> apply_relocate_add(), which attempts to write to read-only memory when
> CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX=y.
>
> R_PPC_ADDR16_LO, R_PPC_ADDR16_HI, R_PPC_ADDR16_HA and R_PPC_REL24 are
> the types generated by the kpatch-build userspace tool or klp-convert
> kernel tree observed applying a relocation to a post-init module.
>
> Use patch_instruction() to patch those relocations.
>
> Commit 8734b41b3efe ("powerpc/module_64: Fix livepatching for
> RO modules") did similar change in module_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> Cc: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c
> index a491ad481d85..a0432ef46967 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/bug.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> #include <asm/setup.h>
> +#include <asm/code-patching.h>
>
> /* Count how many different relocations (different symbol, different
> addend) */
> @@ -174,15 +175,25 @@ static uint32_t do_plt_call(void *location,
> entry++;
> }
>
> - entry->jump[0] = PPC_RAW_LIS(_R12, PPC_HA(val));
> - entry->jump[1] = PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R12, _R12, PPC_LO(val));
> - entry->jump[2] = PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12);
> - entry->jump[3] = PPC_RAW_BCTR();
> + if (patch_instruction(&entry->jump[0], ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_LIS(_R12, PPC_HA(val)))))
> + return 0;
> + if (patch_instruction(&entry->jump[1], ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R12, _R12, PPC_LO(val)))))
> + return 0;
> + if (patch_instruction(&entry->jump[2], ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12))))
> + return 0;
> + if (patch_instruction(&entry->jump[3], ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_BCTR())))
> + return 0;
>
> pr_debug("Initialized plt for 0x%x at %p\n", val, entry);
> return (uint32_t)entry;
> }
>
> +static int patch_location_16(uint32_t *loc, u16 value)
> +{
> + loc = PTR_ALIGN_DOWN(loc, sizeof(u32));
> + return patch_instruction(loc, ppc_inst((*loc & 0xffff0000) | value));
> +}
> +
> int apply_relocate_add(Elf32_Shdr *sechdrs,
> const char *strtab,
> unsigned int symindex,
> @@ -216,37 +227,42 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf32_Shdr *sechdrs,
>
> case R_PPC_ADDR16_LO:
> /* Low half of the symbol */
> - *(uint16_t *)location = value;
> + if (patch_location_16(location, PPC_LO(value)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> break;
>
> case R_PPC_ADDR16_HI:
> /* Higher half of the symbol */
> - *(uint16_t *)location = (value >> 16);
> + if (patch_location_16(location, PPC_HI(value)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> break;
>
> case R_PPC_ADDR16_HA:
> - /* Sign-adjusted lower 16 bits: PPC ELF ABI says:
> - (((x >> 16) + ((x & 0x8000) ? 1 : 0))) & 0xFFFF.
> - This is the same, only sane.
> - */
> - *(uint16_t *)location = (value + 0x8000) >> 16;
> + if (patch_location_16(location, PPC_HA(value)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> break;
>
> case R_PPC_REL24:
> if ((int)(value - (uint32_t)location) < -0x02000000
> - || (int)(value - (uint32_t)location) >= 0x02000000)
> + || (int)(value - (uint32_t)location) >= 0x02000000) {
> value = do_plt_call(location, value,
> sechdrs, module);
> + if (!value)
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
>
> /* Only replace bits 2 through 26 */
> pr_debug("REL24 value = %08X. location = %08X\n",
> value, (uint32_t)location);
> pr_debug("Location before: %08X.\n",
> *(uint32_t *)location);
> - *(uint32_t *)location
> - = (*(uint32_t *)location & ~0x03fffffc)
> + value = (*(uint32_t *)location & ~0x03fffffc)
> | ((value - (uint32_t)location)
> & 0x03fffffc);
> +
> + if (patch_instruction(location, ppc_inst(value)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> pr_debug("Location after: %08X.\n",
> *(uint32_t *)location);
> pr_debug("ie. jump to %08X+%08X = %08X\n",
> --
> 2.33.1
>
IIRC, offlist we hacked up klp-convert to create the klp-relocations for
a 32-bit target and then you hit the selftest late relocation crash, so
I assume that part is happy after this fix. :) Thanks again for the
testing.
For the livepatching implications,
Acked-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
-- Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-20 16:37 [PATCH v2 00/13] Implement livepatch on PPC32 and more Christophe Leroy
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] livepatch: Fix build failure on 32 bits processors Christophe Leroy
2021-12-22 13:47 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-01-04 19:35 ` Joe Lawrence
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] tracing: Fix selftest config check for function graph start up test Christophe Leroy
2022-02-24 13:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-24 14:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-24 15:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-24 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-25 2:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] powerpc/module_32: Fix livepatching for RO modules Christophe Leroy
2022-01-04 19:44 ` Joe Lawrence [this message]
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] powerpc/ftrace: Add support for livepatch to PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-12-22 14:00 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] powerpc/ftrace: Don't save again LR in ftrace_regs_caller() on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] powerpc/ftrace: Simplify PPC32's return_to_handler() Christophe Leroy
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare PPC32's ftrace_caller() for CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS Christophe Leroy
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare PPC64's " Christophe Leroy
2022-02-14 15:19 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS Christophe Leroy
2021-12-22 14:19 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-02-14 15:25 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-02-15 8:00 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-15 11:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-02-15 13:36 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-02-15 14:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-15 14:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-15 16:25 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-02-16 13:04 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-02-16 13:27 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-02-15 14:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-15 16:26 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] powerpc/ftrace: Refactor ftrace_{en/dis}able_ftrace_graph_caller Christophe Leroy
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] powerpc/ftrace: directly call of function graph tracer by ftrace caller Christophe Leroy
2022-02-14 17:24 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-02-14 19:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare ftrace_64_mprofile.S for reuse by PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2022-02-14 17:51 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-02-15 8:33 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-12-20 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace_32.S Christophe Leroy
2022-02-11 7:41 ` [PATCH] Fixup for next-test 3a1a8f078670 ("powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace_32.S") Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Implement livepatch on PPC32 and more Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdSjlgflqKi6Raof@redhat.com \
--to=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).