From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with code-patching selftests
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:33:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfKfDnbNGina2lKz@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yt9dsft9gvyo.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 02:16:31PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:46:01AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:27:04 +0000
> >> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ah, so those non-ELF relocations for the mcount_loc table just mean "apply the
> >> > KASLR offset here", which is equivalent for all entries.
> >> >
> >> > That makes sense, thanks!
> >>
> >> And this is why we were having such a hard time understanding each other ;-)
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > With that in mind, I think that we understand that the build-time sort works
> > for:
> >
> > * arch/x86, becuase the non-ELF relocations for mcount_loc happen to be
> > equivalent.
> >
> > * arch/arm, because there's no dynamic relocaiton and the mcount_loc entries
> > have been finalized prior to sorting.
> >
> > ... but doesn't work for anyone else (including arm64) because the ELF
> > relocations are not equivalent, and need special care that is not yet
> > implemented.
>
> For s390 my idea is to just skip the addresses between __start_mcount_loc
> and __stop_mcount_loc, because for these addresses we know that they are
> 64 bits wide, so we just need to add the KASLR offset.
>
> I'm thinking about something like this:
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h b/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h
> index f75cc31a77dd..015d7e2e94ef 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct vmlinux_info {
> unsigned long rela_dyn_start;
> unsigned long rela_dyn_end;
> unsigned long amode31_size;
> + unsigned long start_mcount_loc;
> + unsigned long stop_mcount_loc;
> };
>
> /* Symbols defined by linker scripts */
> diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/startup.c b/arch/s390/boot/startup.c
> index 1aa11a8f57dd..7bb0d88db5c6 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/boot/startup.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/boot/startup.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ static void handle_relocs(unsigned long offset)
> dynsym = (Elf64_Sym *) vmlinux.dynsym_start;
> for (rela = rela_start; rela < rela_end; rela++) {
> loc = rela->r_offset + offset;
> + if ((loc >= vmlinux.start_mcount_loc) &&
> + (loc < vmlinux.stop_mcount_loc)) {
> + (*(unsigned long *)loc) += offset;
> + continue;
> + }
> val = rela->r_addend;
> r_sym = ELF64_R_SYM(rela->r_info);
> if (r_sym) {
> @@ -232,6 +237,8 @@ static void offset_vmlinux_info(unsigned long offset)
> vmlinux.rela_dyn_start += offset;
> vmlinux.rela_dyn_end += offset;
> vmlinux.dynsym_start += offset;
> + vmlinux.start_mcount_loc += offset;
> + vmlinux.stop_mcount_loc += offset;
> }
>
> static unsigned long reserve_amode31(unsigned long safe_addr)
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index 42c43521878f..51c773405608 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ SECTIONS
> QUAD(__rela_dyn_start) /* rela_dyn_start */
> QUAD(__rela_dyn_end) /* rela_dyn_end */
> QUAD(_eamode31 - _samode31) /* amode31_size */
> + QUAD(__start_mcount_loc)
> + QUAD(__stop_mcount_loc)
> } :NONE
>
> /* Debugging sections. */
>
> Not sure whether that would also work on power, and also not sure
> whether i missed something thinking about that. Maybe it doesn't even
> work. ;-)
I don't know enough about s390 or powerpc relocs to say whether that works, but
I can say that approach isn't going to work for arm64 without other signficant
changes.
I want to get the regression fixed ASAP, so can we take a simple patch for -rc2
which disables the build-time sort where it's currently broken (by limiting the
opt-in to arm and x86), then follow-up per-architecture to re-enable it if
desired/safe?
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 9:19 [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with code-patching selftests Sachin Sant
2022-01-24 12:15 ` Yinan Liu
2022-01-24 16:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 3:20 ` Yinan Liu
2022-01-26 14:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 11:46 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:20 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:59 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 13:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 14:54 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:04 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 12:27 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 13:08 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:16 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 13:33 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-01-27 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 14:56 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 16:41 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 4:00 ` Sachin Sant
2022-01-25 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfKfDnbNGina2lKz@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yinan@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox