From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A58C433EF for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JnS0P5T9rz3cZw for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:23:49 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=fTeURveP; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=batv+c8a487c16eeb054acd37+6735+infradead.org+hch@bombadil.srs.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=fTeURveP; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JnRzh5f1Zz2y0B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:23:12 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=LgcNEscPK7A82N0xwygPOGsKpSsV//8pkOJRPKbq18M=; b=fTeURvePtpWBWNVCu5sZZ9Oh4w h3Bra+rreCVeO1rckuTuRM0RiWTbtxaemvfv3L1WnhxGjHhCbD9sXGipY4zxfUsVhTrp6LkBZB6hO 1soj7ib66BJyhmaNVF8J7POCawaByH+ixrvkwPiwUHiiH4tJ5bUB8GKpQzxDdp5ZJXZryEx1KgdA3 jgxHjAfbHvet9+WzmnL/naKMwJ9GJ1qiwlB2+vbMZebAapKNbNySMIRr7nQpjr/sQxzU2ZYwbhWcm ZiFx4w595ItXCgdftwpwAQH5M2uOgtRbUYN41kob+5WpoK3kEegPqeOqIKkDXcfDdy8wkMNVxPRG3 4kjY9SMw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nEVi4-009JmW-Jp; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:23:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:23:04 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: guoren@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/17] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig Message-ID: References: <20220129121728.1079364-1-guoren@kernel.org> <20220129121728.1079364-6-guoren@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220129121728.1079364-6-guoren@kernel.org> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, drew@beagleboard.org, anup@brainfault.org, wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel , palmer@dabbelt.com, liush@allwinnertech.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wefu@redhat.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 08:17:16PM +0800, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > From: Guo Ren > > Let's follow the origin patch's spirit: > > The only difference between rv32_defconfig and defconfig is that > rv32_defconfig has CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I=y. > > This is helpful to compare rv64-compat-rv32 v.s. rv32-linux. > > Fixes: 1b937e8faa87ccfb ("RISC-V: Add separate defconfig for 32bit systems") > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren Wouldn't a common.config that generats both the 32-bit and 64-bit configs a better idea?