From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27844C433F5 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jv9YD08GCz3bWj for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 06:53:36 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=kMS+/VC4; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d; helo=mail-pf1-x42d.google.com; envelope-from=seanjc@google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=kMS+/VC4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jv9XP4MPCz3bPT for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 06:52:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id r19so6120921pfh.6 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:52:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nFEbKA8UOj2F0aYmafhYdx9MoDnLhZL6FzGdA3foG6Y=; b=kMS+/VC4xCdhdLklBPMZrl1DDgsPdemkNlQ+9xJdsF7MXhYOau3XWTVe4FOrwEqNCE AtJl33LpEFo6tfuoyyjy0zXo24YUgl2rkRpZDMF8C8XU1aeb1hng1SUX4zjzRKukMAQ9 27hgmz8ku+LmTHBmD6JLUcxGm2ViDLqKuaJNEonZsgpd0HlXbksTP9GkQqwkK3nofxzk 9N3WOhuOj7Zmr/5Cp7EeaMz/pprsSKTROefT+5wZO27PB8CVnklUVAkPBIVMBiLCrHCw jl9lkCtgzT6We8ITi8RRxUdBU2p3bPtKzg04MIXkdCVNZOh+d/Fln2r4rSPfvBbdqxfm cNnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nFEbKA8UOj2F0aYmafhYdx9MoDnLhZL6FzGdA3foG6Y=; b=5qNo3t7ORWJ5qV4zF4mCdek+0TPpPQ4DFFzCHZfWFVbP40hcvnhmKBL3ntHzE6rGSe zTXqBlmiL2Xp1oG6XeHm1wGT6x3B8jz4aN2a8ocbLBnEZMeQ3zxKJSoDqo+EVrvQaIad 6L70BMBiTl1Gyze7DdLQD5nGxnn3ZuLZ45uwt1HN5yCAooOGOjfsPCcCcbr/432TFDuh md34L3wt2B9Jc4cfxTUk4ffRDdzIy2SMQv6MwKb9gv7m9DX8B5eIRhfJttGluZomIUH/ fm4+iy0GlIwIHqmQCR0nul+Zl2447xB3Fu4MrWAnQIDSwzFGt+6isZIXCacZWFoKPQ+U K9Wg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lIH4ov3/o55a/xKy+UnsNanlGlg2F6aX8Y+uOsvnquJFNpTnw O3Xa4tr3cfNhK8Jj98gaOGMYdw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEijFR2ADtO2dJpv7+eOnsj3GAeQVvJQZsu/Pn1kY2yGlTgcOn0LgYSwuqCOLhd8P+Pi4JPg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:23d0:: with SMTP id g16mr3889078pfc.19.1644436367723; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:52:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pi9sm7744343pjb.46.2022.02.09.11.52.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:52:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:52:43 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Chao Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Partially revert "KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs" Message-ID: References: <20220209074109.453116-1-chao.gao@intel.com> <20220209074109.453116-3-chao.gao@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220209074109.453116-3-chao.gao@intel.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: x86@kernel.org, Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Paul Walmsley , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexander Gordeev , Claudio Imbrenda , Will Deacon , "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , Huacai Chen , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Dave Hansen , Aleksandar Markovic , Ingo Molnar , Catalin Marinas , Palmer Dabbelt , Christian Borntraeger , Ravi Bangoria , kevin.tian@intel.com, Albert Ou , Vasily Gorbik , Suzuki K Poulose , Heiko Carstens , Borislav Petkov , Atish Patra , tglx@linutronix.de, Alexandru Elisei , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Juergen Gross , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Fabiano Rosas , Nick Desaulniers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bharata B Rao , James Morse , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Anup Patel , pbonzini@redhat.com, Vitaly Kuznetsov , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Feb 09, 2022, Chao Gao wrote: > This partially reverts commit b99040853738 ("KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque > param to additional arch funcs") remove opaque from > kvm_arch_check_processor_compat because no one uses this opaque now. > Address conflicts for ARM (due to file movement) and manually handle RISC-V > which comes after the commit. > > And changes about kvm_arch_hardware_setup() in original commit are still > needed so they are not reverted. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Gao > --- Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson