linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "Nathan Lynch" <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Ohhoon Kwon" <ohoono.kwon@samsung.com>,
	"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Steen Hegelund" <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	"Daniel Henrique Barboza" <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
	YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	"Allan Nielsen" <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Laurent Dufour" <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
	"Horatiu Vultur" <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] of: dynamic: add of_property_alloc() and of_property_free()
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 12:37:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnQLYjcIc0PjvWYR@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e470414-67a5-10ce-95eb-f8093fde70d4@csgroup.eu>

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 07:30:47AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 04/05/2022 à 17:40, Clément Léger a écrit :
> > Add function which allows to dynamically allocate and free properties.
> > Use this function internally for all code that used the same logic
> > (mainly __of_prop_dup()).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/of/dynamic.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >   include/linux/of.h   |  16 +++++++
> >   2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > index cd3821a6444f..e8700e509d2e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > @@ -313,9 +313,7 @@ static void property_list_free(struct property *prop_list)
> >   
> >   	for (prop = prop_list; prop != NULL; prop = next) {
> >   		next = prop->next;
> > -		kfree(prop->name);
> > -		kfree(prop->value);
> > -		kfree(prop);
> > +		of_property_free(prop);
> >   	}
> >   }
> >   
> > @@ -367,48 +365,95 @@ void of_node_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> >   }
> >   
> >   /**
> > - * __of_prop_dup - Copy a property dynamically.
> > - * @prop:	Property to copy
> > + * of_property_free - Free a property allocated dynamically.
> > + * @prop:	Property to be freed
> > + */
> > +void of_property_free(const struct property *prop)
> > +{
> > +	kfree(prop->value);
> > +	kfree(prop->name);
> > +	kfree(prop);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_property_free);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * of_property_alloc - Allocate a property dynamically.
> > + * @name:	Name of the new property
> > + * @value:	Value that will be copied into the new property value
> > + * @value_len:	length of @value to be copied into the new property value
> > + * @len:	Length of new property value, must be greater than @value_len
> >    * @allocflags:	Allocation flags (typically pass GFP_KERNEL)
> >    *
> > - * Copy a property by dynamically allocating the memory of both the
> > + * Create a property by dynamically allocating the memory of both the
> >    * property structure and the property name & contents. The property's
> >    * flags have the OF_DYNAMIC bit set so that we can differentiate between
> >    * dynamically allocated properties and not.
> >    *
> >    * Return: The newly allocated property or NULL on out of memory error.
> >    */
> > -struct property *__of_prop_dup(const struct property *prop, gfp_t allocflags)
> > +struct property *of_property_alloc(const char *name, const void *value,
> > +				   int value_len, int len, gfp_t allocflags)
> >   {
> > -	struct property *new;
> > +	int alloc_len = len;
> > +	struct property *prop;
> > +
> > +	if (len < value_len)
> > +		return NULL;
> >   
> > -	new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), allocflags);
> > -	if (!new)
> > +	prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), allocflags);
> > +	if (!prop)
> >   		return NULL;
> >   
> > +	prop->name = kstrdup(name, allocflags);
> > +	if (!prop->name)
> > +		goto out_err;
> > +
> >   	/*
> > -	 * NOTE: There is no check for zero length value.
> > -	 * In case of a boolean property, this will allocate a value
> > -	 * of zero bytes. We do this to work around the use
> > -	 * of of_get_property() calls on boolean values.
> > +	 * Even if the property has no value, it must be set to a
> > +	 * non-null value since of_get_property() is used to check
> > +	 * some values that might or not have a values (ranges for
> > +	 * instance). Moreover, when the node is released, prop->value
> > +	 * is kfreed so the memory must come from kmalloc.
> >   	 */
> > -	new->name = kstrdup(prop->name, allocflags);
> > -	new->value = kmemdup(prop->value, prop->length, allocflags);
> > -	new->length = prop->length;
> > -	if (!new->name || !new->value)
> > -		goto err_free;
> > +	if (!alloc_len)
> > +		alloc_len = 1;
> >   
> > -	/* mark the property as dynamic */
> > -	of_property_set_flag(new, OF_DYNAMIC);
> > +	prop->value = kzalloc(alloc_len, allocflags);
> > +	if (!prop->value)
> > +		goto out_err;
> >   
> > -	return new;
> > +	if (value)
> > +		memcpy(prop->value, value, value_len);
> 
> Could you use kmemdup() instead of kzalloc+memcpy ?

I'd prefer there be 1 alloc for struct property and value instead of 2. 
And maybe 'name' gets rolled into it too, but that gets a bit more 
complicated to manage I think. 

With memcpy, note this series[1].

Rob

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220504014440.3697851-30-keescook@chromium.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-04 15:40 [PATCH 0/3] of: add of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc/free() Clément Léger
2022-05-04 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] of: dynamic: add of_property_alloc() and of_property_free() Clément Léger
2022-05-05  7:30   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-05  9:47     ` Clément Léger
2022-05-05 17:37     ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-05-06  7:43       ` Clément Léger
2022-05-05 19:37   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-06  7:49     ` Clément Léger
2022-06-01 22:30     ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-06-02 14:06       ` Rob Herring
2022-06-02 18:07         ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-05-04 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] of: dynamic: add of_node_alloc() and of_node_free() Clément Léger
2022-05-05  7:32   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-05 19:43   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-06 10:43     ` Clément Léger
2022-05-09 16:55       ` Rob Herring
2022-05-04 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries: use of_property_*() and of_node_*() functions Clément Léger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnQLYjcIc0PjvWYR@robh.at.kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ohoono.kwon@samsung.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).