From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "Nathan Lynch" <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"Ohhoon Kwon" <ohoono.kwon@samsung.com>,
"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Steen Hegelund" <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
"Daniel Henrique Barboza" <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Allan Nielsen" <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Laurent Dufour" <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
"Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
"Horatiu Vultur" <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] of: dynamic: add of_property_alloc() and of_property_free()
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 12:37:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnQLYjcIc0PjvWYR@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e470414-67a5-10ce-95eb-f8093fde70d4@csgroup.eu>
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 07:30:47AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 04/05/2022 à 17:40, Clément Léger a écrit :
> > Add function which allows to dynamically allocate and free properties.
> > Use this function internally for all code that used the same logic
> > (mainly __of_prop_dup()).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/dynamic.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > include/linux/of.h | 16 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > index cd3821a6444f..e8700e509d2e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > @@ -313,9 +313,7 @@ static void property_list_free(struct property *prop_list)
> >
> > for (prop = prop_list; prop != NULL; prop = next) {
> > next = prop->next;
> > - kfree(prop->name);
> > - kfree(prop->value);
> > - kfree(prop);
> > + of_property_free(prop);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -367,48 +365,95 @@ void of_node_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * __of_prop_dup - Copy a property dynamically.
> > - * @prop: Property to copy
> > + * of_property_free - Free a property allocated dynamically.
> > + * @prop: Property to be freed
> > + */
> > +void of_property_free(const struct property *prop)
> > +{
> > + kfree(prop->value);
> > + kfree(prop->name);
> > + kfree(prop);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_property_free);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * of_property_alloc - Allocate a property dynamically.
> > + * @name: Name of the new property
> > + * @value: Value that will be copied into the new property value
> > + * @value_len: length of @value to be copied into the new property value
> > + * @len: Length of new property value, must be greater than @value_len
> > * @allocflags: Allocation flags (typically pass GFP_KERNEL)
> > *
> > - * Copy a property by dynamically allocating the memory of both the
> > + * Create a property by dynamically allocating the memory of both the
> > * property structure and the property name & contents. The property's
> > * flags have the OF_DYNAMIC bit set so that we can differentiate between
> > * dynamically allocated properties and not.
> > *
> > * Return: The newly allocated property or NULL on out of memory error.
> > */
> > -struct property *__of_prop_dup(const struct property *prop, gfp_t allocflags)
> > +struct property *of_property_alloc(const char *name, const void *value,
> > + int value_len, int len, gfp_t allocflags)
> > {
> > - struct property *new;
> > + int alloc_len = len;
> > + struct property *prop;
> > +
> > + if (len < value_len)
> > + return NULL;
> >
> > - new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), allocflags);
> > - if (!new)
> > + prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), allocflags);
> > + if (!prop)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + prop->name = kstrdup(name, allocflags);
> > + if (!prop->name)
> > + goto out_err;
> > +
> > /*
> > - * NOTE: There is no check for zero length value.
> > - * In case of a boolean property, this will allocate a value
> > - * of zero bytes. We do this to work around the use
> > - * of of_get_property() calls on boolean values.
> > + * Even if the property has no value, it must be set to a
> > + * non-null value since of_get_property() is used to check
> > + * some values that might or not have a values (ranges for
> > + * instance). Moreover, when the node is released, prop->value
> > + * is kfreed so the memory must come from kmalloc.
> > */
> > - new->name = kstrdup(prop->name, allocflags);
> > - new->value = kmemdup(prop->value, prop->length, allocflags);
> > - new->length = prop->length;
> > - if (!new->name || !new->value)
> > - goto err_free;
> > + if (!alloc_len)
> > + alloc_len = 1;
> >
> > - /* mark the property as dynamic */
> > - of_property_set_flag(new, OF_DYNAMIC);
> > + prop->value = kzalloc(alloc_len, allocflags);
> > + if (!prop->value)
> > + goto out_err;
> >
> > - return new;
> > + if (value)
> > + memcpy(prop->value, value, value_len);
>
> Could you use kmemdup() instead of kzalloc+memcpy ?
I'd prefer there be 1 alloc for struct property and value instead of 2.
And maybe 'name' gets rolled into it too, but that gets a bit more
complicated to manage I think.
With memcpy, note this series[1].
Rob
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220504014440.3697851-30-keescook@chromium.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-04 15:40 [PATCH 0/3] of: add of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc/free() Clément Léger
2022-05-04 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] of: dynamic: add of_property_alloc() and of_property_free() Clément Léger
2022-05-05 7:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-05 9:47 ` Clément Léger
2022-05-05 17:37 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-05-06 7:43 ` Clément Léger
2022-05-05 19:37 ` Rob Herring
2022-05-06 7:49 ` Clément Léger
2022-06-01 22:30 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-06-02 14:06 ` Rob Herring
2022-06-02 18:07 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-05-04 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] of: dynamic: add of_node_alloc() and of_node_free() Clément Léger
2022-05-05 7:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-05 19:43 ` Rob Herring
2022-05-06 10:43 ` Clément Léger
2022-05-09 16:55 ` Rob Herring
2022-05-04 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries: use of_property_*() and of_node_*() functions Clément Léger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnQLYjcIc0PjvWYR@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ohoono.kwon@samsung.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).