From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89013C433EF for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KyJ0c0dljz3cGT for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 22:54:56 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=prHSrTuY; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.68.75; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=broonie@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=prHSrTuY; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KyHzv0r0hz3bXR for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 22:54:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B1BB81D2F; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65B65C385C6; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:54:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1652187254; bh=4PivaWWi4aEx+cxNzcxek9VaB+oZC2dWimjoWJP0lEo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=prHSrTuY6SWToZk1S1G9KfEht4wO8o9B6JcZav7Jczb+IsjukMdEwDYWRiBweoJo8 YPhv3WJ1ivSV9Ogg4OcHvox5ZIRJH30+2bDQB5YyCux8FxtykmT03WlZkrzuOUXtCp vlUJ5lmdEl2wieeeXEHobRBBpA1RnOcCP6+5aW7Q37uVoam18/1b3cKjLjuMOY6n4c i/tel7fHiiz8zoiek7/ffgOHy3MZXEcARJ8reaQn1vMzUlQLazBW8RCa+yT3sjX4/3 LOl/gKSoeIXiKB/pAEGmp4EsC1zoT0a9mUAoiqfKvktbfb9yzYrDsMroI2eIiti8c+ HuoPtieR/WPrw== Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:54:08 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Shengjiu Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl_micfil: Add support for i.MX8MPlus Message-ID: References: <1652087663-1908-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2Z522tNyah4CHNrF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1652087663-1908-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> X-Cookie: I've read SEVEN MILLION books!! X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --2Z522tNyah4CHNrF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 05:14:22PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > On i.MX8Plus there are two updates for micfil module. >=20 > One is that the output format is S32_LE, only the 24 more > significative bits have information, the other bits are always > zero. Add 'formats' variable in soc data to distinguish the > format on different platform. You can set sig_bits to say that only the top 24 bits are meaningful, though I'm not sure many userspace applications pay any attention. --2Z522tNyah4CHNrF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmJ6YG8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AAZAf9FIpl1VBhFVT54/Bc818gjoAdE0BtGCj8hJx+BkHhVZrP/j/zQDPMsSwm MicGHeGYNhAOFvKVkSFNg+9bZkho8sFtnlEaJfZ/JqFob5427lAlk4fr1EcfqU8f 1ICz//JQzP6UAXI9UpI/JlqdBRHbW9OmMiQiVCtoGSPV4ReuXP4vQTvW6nSdFeXS yJaa7rvTSHn92leRXDek3XAxGEuci7VJ/zvFFxbO9wPLXGEj6VkMqSSaJ+an2Rgy bfB4kztha4PQsEPWaMZxYkbxwiLTNIDKYNMRkUWc43OpxCF6+hu5jimP18vRToGl 25szXXQxFjmC9ojtkMeYsNeOQBqYPw== =M2n0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2Z522tNyah4CHNrF--