From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED249C433F5 for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 22:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4L441q3HLBz3bnJ for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 08:15:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede1 header.b=qJ/FgyV3; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.com (client-ip=195.135.220.29; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pmladek@suse.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede1 header.b=qJ/FgyV3; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4L3gnZ6DfQz2ywQ for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:04:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6261F9DC; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:03:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1652943838; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=395st/CngVntAAOn5uSBsdHcf6UJsehUQOcbe6ab9wI=; b=qJ/FgyV3p4LuXUdkZjoAbs2+ewn4o7aNZN0S67D2rC96Mde70WoKxt5D1iYy3vIxFGNywX NYQFStO7xXozlUSKqQPZCblT/M2McgEFa5ttVGDSrZzFsBjH4DUBLxqHsrlOhubnXz8Ip9 VRfQAfc3f6HDJx77hS/XQSQpNXuMeJQ= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813A52C141; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 09:03:52 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/30] panic: Add the panic hypervisor notifier list Message-ID: References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-20-gpiccoli@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 May 2022 08:15:30 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paul Mackerras , Justin Chen , Pavel Machek , Alexander Gordeev , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Wei Liu , stern@rowland.harvard.edu, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Christian Borntraeger , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Nicholas Piggin , luto@kernel.org, Mihai Carabas , tglx@linutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger , Vasily Gorbik , vgoyal@redhat.com, Sven Schnelle , Andrea Parri , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de, Scott Branden , Doug Berger , Markus Mayer , hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, fabiomirmar@gmail.com, halves@canonical.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com, feng.tang@intel.com, zhenwei pi , will@kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , bhe@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, Dexuan Cui , Evan Green , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Tianyu Lan , keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, Haiyang Zhang , rostedt@goodmis.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Brian Norris , "David S. Miller" , peterz@infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Shile Zhang , Wang ShaoBo , Christophe JAILLET , David Gow , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, Hari Bathini , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@gpiccoli.net, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Julius Werner , vkuznets@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed 2022-05-18 10:16:20, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > On 18/05/2022 04:58, Petr Mladek wrote: > > [...] > >> I does similar things like kmsg_dump() so it should be called in > >> the same location (after info notifier list and before kdump). > >> > >> A solution might be to put it at these notifiers at the very > >> end of the "info" list or make extra "dump" notifier list. > > > > I just want to point out that the above idea has problems. > > Notifiers storing kernel log need to be treated as kmsg_dump(). > > In particular, we would need to know if there are any. > > We do not need to call "info" notifier list before kdump > > when there is no kernel log dumper registered. > > > > Notifiers respect the priority concept, which is just a number that > orders the list addition (and the list is called in order). > > I've used the last position to panic_print() [in patch 25] - one idea > here is to "reserve" the last position (represented by INT_MIN) for > notifiers that act like kmsg_dump(). I couldn't find any IIRC, but that > doesn't prevent us to save this position and comment about that. I would ignore it for now. If anyone would want to safe the log then they would need to read it. They will most likely use the existing kmsg_dump() infastructure. In fact, they should use it to avoid a code duplication. Best Regards, Petr