Re: [PATCH kernel] powerpc/iommu: Add iommu_ops to report capabilities and allow blocking domains

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 12:58:00PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
 
> driver->ops->attach_group on POWER attaches a group so VFIO claims ownership
> over a group, not devices. Underlying API (pnv_ioda2_take_ownership()) does
> not need to keep track of the state, it is one group, one ownership
> transfer, easy.

It should not change, I think you can just map the attach_dev to the group?

> What is exactly the reason why iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() cannot stay
> inside Type1 (sorry if it was explained, I could have missed)?

It has nothing to do with type1 - the ownership system is designed to
exclude other in-kernel drivers from using the group at the same time
vfio is using the group. power still needs this protection regardless
of if is using the formal iommu api or not.

> Also, from another mail, you said iommu_alloc_default_domain() should fail
> on power but at least IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED must be supported, or the whole
> iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() thing falls apart.

Yes

> And iommu_ops::domain_alloc() is not told if it is asked to create a default
> domain, it only takes a type.

"default domain" refers to the default type pased to domain_alloc(),
it will never be blocking, so it will always fail on power.

"default domain" is better understood as the domain used by the DMA
API

Jason