From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:59:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKz912KyFQ7q9qwL@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZKzSHDPR7Jfoz/G8@ovpn-8-26.pek2.redhat.com>
On 07/11/23 at 11:53am, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:35:50AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/10/23 at 05:14pm, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > > > still returns all CPUs.
> > > >
> > > > That's simply broken. Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > > > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
> > >
> > > That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> > >
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> > > simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
> >
> > I don't know maxcpus on arm and ppc64 well. But maxcpus=1 or nr_cpus=1
> > are suggested parameter. Because usually nr_cpus=1 is enough to make
> > kdump kernel work well to capture vmcore. However, user is allowed to
> > specify nr_cpus=n (n>1) if they think multiple cpus are needed in kdump
> > kernel. Your hard coding of cpu number in kdump kernel may be not so
> > reasonable.
>
> As I mentioned, for arm/ppc64, passing 'maxcpus=1' actually follows
> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
>
> 'nr_cpus=N' just works fine, so not related with this topic.
>
> After 'maxcpus=1' is passed, kernel only brings up one of cpu cores as
> online during booting, and others still can be put into online by
> userspace. Now this way causes IO timeout on some storage device which
> uses managed irq and supports multiple io queues.
>
> Here the focus is if passing 'maxcpus=1' is valid for kdump
> kernel, that is we want to hear from our arch/kdump guys.
Yes, 'maxcpus=1' is valid and suggested on ppc64 for kdump kernel
if needed, because there's no 'nr_cpus=' support on ppc64 yet.
>
> If yes, something needs to be fixed, such as, what this patchset is
> doing.
>
> >
> > Please cc kexec mailing list when posting so that people can view the
> > whole thread of discussion.
>
> Already Cc kexe & arm/powerpc & irq list.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230708020259.1343736-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20230708020259.1343736-3-ming.lei@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20230710064109.GB24519@lst.de>
2023-07-10 9:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues Ming Lei
2023-07-10 16:51 ` Keith Busch
2023-07-11 1:33 ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11 3:35 ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11 3:53 ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11 6:59 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-07-11 3:55 ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11 4:05 ` Pingfan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZKz912KyFQ7q9qwL@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wenxiong@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).