From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362E7C4332F for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 22:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=nO+oAXc4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SLMKh2ThFz3cjr for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 09:35:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=nO+oAXc4; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a; helo=mail-yw1-x114a.google.com; envelope-from=3k9jczqykdhqkwsfbuyggydw.ugedafmphhu-vwndaklk.grdstk.gjy@flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SLMJm22d1z2xqp for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 09:35:02 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5a90d6ab944so5416607b3.2 for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2023 15:35:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1698878099; x=1699482899; darn=lists.ozlabs.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oVrvOLECZXxSaWjRNpKGTaiE8FNIaCo3DEHHzsR8PGo=; b=nO+oAXc4nipSvpXPrR17To9eKTlEQCNp04hGm4Yucovt5WrdnYtbfAOaKVOzle664+ aBv6Hhx1tHfqR7inRbQMbNHk1qQ7jrhfXqyOqmtKZXsG6Lmd8Dd1MzmxffB187xYnFLf bYW/kjXVOgxSGhmHq3BSWPz0Jcl2P2pOPbmUffJeUTtchA6kMl2+JERBfAVRe7tgtvNn cAS5lTnR11o5opB/B5UxkVkCYoAZ6X7wLCHvD5+a6wp/O2TDCZrP27Z2a+mMhXF25quE oCvU3aHdaJnzsjkaothapN6y0SMXz+aQAJ21CYRGEplexXr8VVvUHGleoX0ovwRtykS6 LtzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698878099; x=1699482899; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oVrvOLECZXxSaWjRNpKGTaiE8FNIaCo3DEHHzsR8PGo=; b=majORnPiP6Ktjw+gYZHoRDaY0l3rr0AzavRQD04qbuuGXOPClIDgjib4clPBvXRAkB vmWfMWQugcChCIbEtVgFvEJG0Sw1d05x0qJnBU7NHoEv4xypw5THZlQxLuC/P538L+Gy K/aUi5n8n8uvWUahbN2/wwOICv423Ri0Sfh7+720PQBYMj//O7LoF1efjWw1FW3c7Bw4 Ore51yBHBHMdTzk1vP79hla7XuDClYefyZtZOsia6TA9BzDSHiIo7ttuG8xM6hXHKVuT acCTdCS9svEiaKX8vchLA3IA+oaTK0yWTXOSYBU5/twuUjA44BijPW8DFKn8rE2thwnv K4kw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzfiyplMGF9uyXAoIgShe12u4sJ6R2t5hjiO1Y+ks8wwsQUPi4D U7WVzYUTXHubvvK3kkKaYwax24H21VA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGD6UN3MOOerdMFLEmny4gzkak60wHqIVXKsA4NlWLNqw1UJj00i84usFlUQuEsQ45Qnt2ok92VRKM= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a81:9214:0:b0:5a7:bbdb:6b39 with SMTP id j20-20020a819214000000b005a7bbdb6b39mr350826ywg.3.1698878099514; Wed, 01 Nov 2023 15:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 15:34:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4ca2253d-276f-43c5-8e9f-0ded5d5b2779@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20231027182217.3615211-1-seanjc@google.com> <20231027182217.3615211-18-seanjc@google.com> <7c0844d8-6f97-4904-a140-abeabeb552c1@intel.com> <92ba7ddd-2bc8-4a8d-bd67-d6614b21914f@intel.com> <4ca2253d-276f-43c5-8e9f-0ded5d5b2779@redhat.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 17/35] KVM: Add transparent hugepage support for dedicated guest memory From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Chao Peng , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Isaku Yamahata , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Xiaoyao Li , "Matthew Wilcox \(Oracle\)" , Wang , Fuad Tabba , Yu Zhang , Maciej Szmigiero , Albert Ou , Vlastimil Babka , Michael Roth , Ackerley Tng , Alexander Viro , Paul Walmsley , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= , Isaku Yamahata , Christian Brauner , Quentin Perret , A nup Patel , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Upton , David Matlack , Jarkko Sakkinen , Palmer Dabbelt , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Merwick , Andrew Morton , Vishal Annapurve , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Xu Yilun , Anish Moorthy Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Nov 01, 2023, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 11/1/23 17:36, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > "Allow" isn't perfect, e.g. I would much prefer a straight KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_USE_HUGEPAGES > > > > or KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGES flag, but I wanted the name to convey that KVM doesn't > > > > (yet) guarantee hugepages. I.e. KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE is stronger than > > > > a hint, but weaker than a requirement. And if/when KVM supports a dedicated memory > > > > pool of some kind, then we can add KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_REQUIRE_HUGEPAGE. > > > I think that the current patch is fine, but I will adjust it to always > > > allow the flag, and to make the size check even if !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE. > > > If hugepages are not guaranteed, and (theoretically) you could have no > > > hugepage at all in the result, it's okay to get this result even if THP is not > > > available in the kernel. > > Can you post a fixup patch? It's not clear to me exactly what behavior you intend > > to end up with. > > Sure, just this: > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c > index 7d1a33c2ad42..34fd070e03d9 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c > @@ -430,10 +430,7 @@ int kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_guest_memfd *args) > { > loff_t size = args->size; > u64 flags = args->flags; > - u64 valid_flags = 0; > - > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) > - valid_flags |= KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE; > + u64 valid_flags = KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE; > if (flags & ~valid_flags) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -441,11 +438,9 @@ int kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_guest_memfd *args) > if (size < 0 || !PAGE_ALIGNED(size)) > return -EINVAL; > -#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > if ((flags & KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE) && > !IS_ALIGNED(size, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)) > return -EINVAL; > -#endif That won't work, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE is valid only for CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y. #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */ #define HPAGE_PMD_SHIFT ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; }) #define HPAGE_PMD_MASK ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; }) #define HPAGE_PMD_SIZE ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; }) ... > return __kvm_gmem_create(kvm, size, flags); > } > > Paolo >