linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, eric_devolder@yahoo.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kexec: fix KEXEC_FILE dependencies
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:03:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUNXxp9AIkjQkP9s@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b71034f4-5cdc-44e0-b72f-1a8ffae0593e@app.fastmail.com>

Hi Arnd,

On 10/24/23 at 03:17pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 14:44, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Just add people and mailing list to CC since I didn't find this mail in
> > my box, just drag it via 'b4 am'.
> >
> > On 10/23/23 at 01:01pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ......
> 
> >> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
> >> index 7aff28ded2f48..bfc636d64ff2b 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
> >> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
> >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ config KEXEC
> >>  config KEXEC_FILE
> >>  	bool "Enable kexec file based system call"
> >>  	depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE
> >> +	depends on CRYPTO_SHA256=y || !ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> >
> > I am not sure if the logic is correct. In theory, kexec_file code
> > utilizes purgatory to verify the checksum digested during kernel loading
> > when try to jump to the kernel. That means kexec_file depends on
> > purgatory, but not contrary?
> 
> The expression I wrote is a bit confusing, but I think this just
> keeps the existing behavior:
> 
> - on architectures that select ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
>   (powerpc, riscv, s390 and x86), we also require CRYPTO_SHA256
>   to be built-in.
> - on architectures that do not have ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
>   (arm64 and parisc), CRYPTO_SHA256 is not used and can be disabled
>   or =m.
> 
> Since ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY is a 'bool' symbol, it could
> be written as
> 
> depends on (ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY && CRYPTO_SHA256=y) \
>            || !ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> 
> if you find that clearer. I see that the second patch
> actually gets this wrong, it should actually do
> 
> select CRYPTO if ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> select CRYPTO_SHA256 if ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> 
> > With these changes, we can achieve the goal to avoid building issue,
> > whereas the code logic becomes confusing. E.g people could disable
> > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, but still get purgatory code built in which is
> > totally useless.
> >
> > Not sure if I think too much over this.
> 
> I see your point here, and I would suggest changing the
> CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY symbol to just indicate
> the availability of the purgatory code for the arch, rather
> than actually controlling the code itself. I already mentioned
> this for s390, but riscv would need the same thing on top.
> 
> I think the change below should address your concern.

Since no new comment, do you mind spinning v2 to wrap all these up?

Thanks
Baoquan

> 
>      Arnd
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c
> index e60fbd8660c4..3ac341d296db 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void *elf_kexec_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>                 cmdline = modified_cmdline;
>         }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
>         /* Add purgatory to the image */
>         kbuf.top_down = true;
>         kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void *elf_kexec_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>                                              sizeof(kernel_start), 0);
>         if (ret)
>                 pr_err("Error update purgatory ret=%d\n", ret);
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
>  
>         /* Add the initrd to the image */
>         if (initrd != NULL) {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kbuild b/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> index d25ad1c19f88..ab181d187c23 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB) += boot/dts/
>  obj-y += errata/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += kvm/
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY) += purgatory/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE) += purgatory/
>  
>  # for cleaning
>  subdir- += boot
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kbuild b/arch/s390/Kbuild
> index a5d3503b353c..361aa01dbd49 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kbuild
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_S390_HYPFS)        += hypfs/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE)    += appldata/
>  obj-y                          += net/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)              += pci/
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY) += purgatory/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)       += purgatory/
>  
>  # for cleaning
>  subdir- += boot tools
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-23 11:01 [PATCH 1/2] kexec: fix KEXEC_FILE dependencies Arnd Bergmann
2023-10-23 11:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] kexec: select CRYPTO from KEXEC_FILE instead of depending on it Arnd Bergmann
2023-10-24  3:55   ` Baoquan He
2023-10-24  4:10     ` Baoquan He
2023-10-24  7:09       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-10-23 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] kexec: fix KEXEC_FILE dependencies Conor Dooley
2023-10-23 16:04   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-10-23 16:12     ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-24 12:44 ` Baoquan He
2023-10-24 13:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-10-25  9:58     ` Baoquan He
2023-10-25 12:59       ` Eric DeVolder
2023-11-02  8:03     ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-11-30 16:56       ` Andrew Morton
2023-11-30 20:54         ` Eric DeVolder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZUNXxp9AIkjQkP9s@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=eric_devolder@yahoo.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).