linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
Cc: vadimp@nvidia.com, lee@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz, kernel@sberdevices.ru,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] devm_led_classdev_register() usage problem
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:28:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWDBOfpsC5AVT8bX@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231025130737.2015468-1-gnstark@salutedevices.com>

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 04:07:29PM +0300, George Stark wrote:
> Lots of drivers use devm_led_classdev_register() to register their led objects
> and let the kernel free those leds at the driver's remove stage.
> It can lead to a problem due to led_classdev_unregister()
> implementation calls led_set_brightness() to turn off the led.
> led_set_brightness() may call one of the module's brightness_set callbacks.
> If that callback uses module's resources allocated without using devm funcs()
> then those resources will be already freed at module's remove() callback and
> we may have use-after-free situation.
> 
> Here is an example:
> 
> module_probe()
> {
>     devm_led_classdev_register(module_brightness_set_cb);
>     mutex_init(&mutex);
> }
> 
> module_brightness_set_cb()
> {
>     mutex_lock(&mutex);
>     do_set_brightness();
>     mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> }
> 
> module_remove()
> {
>     mutex_destroy(&mutex);
> }
> 
> at rmmod:
> module_remove()
>     ->mutex_destroy(&mutex);
> devres_release_all()
>     ->led_classdev_unregister();
>         ->led_set_brightness();
>             ->module_brightness_set_cb();
>                  ->mutex_lock(&mutex);  /* use-after-free */
> 
> I think it's an architectural issue and should be discussed thoroughly.
> Some thoughts about fixing it as a start:
> 1) drivers can use devm_led_classdev_unregister() to explicitly free leds before
> dependend resources are freed. devm_led_classdev_register() remains being useful
> to simplify probe implementation.
> As a proof of concept I examined all drivers from drivers/leds and prepared
> patches where it's needed. Sometimes it was not as clean as just calling
> devm_led_classdev_unregister() because several drivers do not track
> their leds object at all - they can call devm_led_classdev_register() and drop the
> returned pointer. In that case I used devres group API.
> 
> Drivers outside drivers/leds should be checked too after discussion.
> 
> 2) remove led_set_brightness from led_classdev_unregister() and force the drivers
> to turn leds off at shutdown. May be add check that led's brightness is 0
> at led_classdev_unregister() and put a warning to dmesg if it's not.
> Actually in many cases it doesn't really need to turn off the leds manually one-by-one
> if driver shutdowns whole led controller. For the last case to disable the warning
> new flag can be brought in e.g LED_AUTO_OFF_AT_SHUTDOWN (similar to LED_RETAIN_AT_SHUTDOWN).

NAK.

Just fix the drivers by wrapping mutex_destroy() into devm, There are many
doing so. You may be brave enough to introduce devm_mutex_init() somewhere
in include/linux/device*

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 13:07 [PATCH 0/8] devm_led_classdev_register() usage problem George Stark
2023-10-25 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] leds: powernv: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown George Stark
2023-10-25 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] leds: nic78bx: " George Stark
2023-11-06  8:13   ` Christophe Leroy
2023-11-09 23:28     ` George Stark
2023-10-25 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] leds: an30259a: " George Stark
2023-10-25 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] leds: mlxreg: " George Stark
2023-10-25 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] leds: aw200xx: " George Stark
2023-10-25 13:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] leds: aw2013: " George Stark
2023-10-25 13:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] leds: lp3952: " George Stark
2023-11-04  7:18 ` [PATCH 0/8] devm_led_classdev_register() usage problem George Stark
2023-11-24 15:30   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-06  8:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-11-24 15:28 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-11-25  0:47   ` George Stark
2023-11-25 11:04     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-27 12:41     ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZWDBOfpsC5AVT8bX@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=gnstark@salutedevices.com \
    --cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=vadimp@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).