From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C119C4167B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 16:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=ifw6UNjU; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Spmqr20CCz30hC for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 03:08:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=ifw6UNjU; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=batv+30fb44a5c54f4ddee986+7414+infradead.org+hch@bombadil.srs.infradead.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Spmpy24vZz2xl6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 03:07:22 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=voX1j54PoeLMwiQxMkFN5YaL2nBXSYPeTjd4yAFjCQA=; b=ifw6UNjUEDXllsbmZ4AL+dQpRW W7b4XK9Kv2/xZ1tcblE7ZfPY/0dMQS0FEvx+i2C6aAE7Zt7MP/UVmUe/mhIExmXNoeKSWR72X4ReC icB9zGsV3UObHyUoHkKwukaPk5sKzjyLMManm+Ed1NR3M9AXPCg7SGx6gNkh/lCOKPdmxYNuDiXKe +vPv++gGyb9vO0onHi8hOeAukUR55fcRtmV0/FupL1Zz4rC0EOk2DlmrIbKBCnZ1/X9rpJ8qxM7fL 5WaQwgOsHX/LIFPFPmJ7abBBvtKt5+kdFvtLwoI1y1PYRxUnUZ4Uky9Byl+Nm//eqRAtc8ufLM3GM rJYlXhJg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rCioR-005edf-1j; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 16:07:19 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:07:19 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Samuel Holland Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/12] lib/raid6: Use CC_FLAGS_FPU for NEON CFLAGS Message-ID: References: <20231208055501.2916202-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com> <20231208055501.2916202-6-samuel.holland@sifive.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231208055501.2916202-6-samuel.holland@sifive.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" > +CFLAGS_REMOVE_neon1.o += $(CC_FLAGS_NO_FPU) > +CFLAGS_REMOVE_neon2.o += $(CC_FLAGS_NO_FPU) > +CFLAGS_REMOVE_neon4.o += $(CC_FLAGS_NO_FPU) > +CFLAGS_REMOVE_neon8.o += $(CC_FLAGS_NO_FPU) Btw, do we even really need the extra variables for compiler flags to remove? Don't gcc/clang options work so that if you add a no-prefixed version of the option later it transparently gets removed? Except for that: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig