From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10BB0C47077 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=o9Gjjz+T; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TDtYY4bP8z3cCM for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:42:25 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=o9Gjjz+T; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org (client-ip=198.137.202.133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=batv+143bb14a0bf582ab00cc+7450+infradead.org+hch@bombadil.srs.infradead.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TDtXY1SVNz3039 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:41:25 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=WtuVntAUUaCAXXG4ld9RtlJPqwKTyVWfU729/RL/Hsw=; b=o9Gjjz+T5kDv5mjN1O1rCFpBHe GjyMdKlmHDPVacqgG9J02XTK47cYYGykjg8ppuXuvAip5m4Oo2tZLsNq/ngiRennfsaO7LQKCRdfC qWURBIOAj24mTBDP391o0WgYKYUTHzpdUcfKs3kbVaNIZ3LB13sVKEE6AuyhSZI1FfgYniot97q0q JwU9NGmxE4jrQ9E6lIc+yc9ue+6pJmffS5jgVXYFfDhm3V3qQxg9AAxGjzIYXx53VVaa2MtDMXvR/ GH6yMxn9hYJ3LX3R0eVMBCTME4Qo8RVdm1YcrTt67RUCn8gs2XfbgYO2reqzRoAig72MObiBsStBH VwK/lYgA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPlWg-00CSYJ-1w; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:38:54 +0000 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:38:54 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nhat Pham Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: z3fold: rename CONFIG_Z3FOLD to CONFIG_Z3FOLD_DEPRECATED Message-ID: References: <20240112193103.3798287-1-yosryahmed@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Miaohe Lin , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-mm@kvack.org, Huacai Chen , Nicholas Piggin , Yosry Ahmed , Sergey Senozhatsky , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Johannes Weiner , "Naveen N. Rao" , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, WANG Xuerui , Vitaly Wool Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:38:30PM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote: > > > > I thought deprecating z3fold is the low hanging fruit. Then, once we > > can sort out the MMU dependency in zsmalloc, we can go after zbud as > > well. > > Makes sense to me. Should we do the same thing to zbud? We probably > have even less of a case for it, no? Is there any user visible effect of switching the allocator? If not it seems a bit pointless to deprecate them vs just removing them (or maybe making z3fold depend on !MMU for now).