From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71696C4345F for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=LW4B+RA/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VFqvL0rnWz3vYy for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 05:46:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=LW4B+RA/; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=mcgrof@infradead.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VFqtY4s6sz2y71 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 05:45:41 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mF3LgyonzoPiLPggKtlEjI/RAYj7UYB9rpei5Ud65w4=; b=LW4B+RA/mLBikoIkjpMDpYn9oP u2YAB5xmL1D4XkoUv1Ve9gQEIQ0TAvvtWmZldKRQqHURClp6PnA6zwtnlpDI5YcucnvadEV7WunWR b/1Iq8vVt1oArh5tcqicc9Z63IyQeyuWCw9WE0oR/Ok86B2YT082t2bjkyb27tRD8lbretuG1UYwR NEF+joRqo6rwX3adbENZeQaNQlnWdEzjPCwZa5i/q7E286YXArA3Jy82X/wR+QDg69SZaiPqn91EB VhUQK10NXrl7tuNE0LjnU4cJYOYOYsXm/2EOsZ/Hcy9WT5WMB3gVzJ0tiJjB3LXt+twOTdZqPWpdj bhUwFHXw==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MS-0000000DwB9-3meA; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:45:28 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , x86@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , Donald Dutile , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Nadav Amit , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Russell King , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Will Deacon , Heiko Carstens , Steven Rostedt , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Puranjay Mohan , linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dinh Nguyen , =?iso-88 59-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Eric Chanudet , Palmer Dabbelt , Andrew Morton , Rick Edgecombe , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better that having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v4 I've taken the first 5 patches through modules-next for now to get early exposure to testing. Of those I just had minor nit feedback on the 5th, but the rest look good. Let's wait for review for the rest of the patches 6-15. Luis