From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A68C4345F for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=sTdsLXFR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VP9z95Yv6z3dV4 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 04:45:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=sTdsLXFR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=mcgrof@infradead.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VP9yP0LZxz3dT4 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 04:44:28 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=r34+nTm/8Jbk3qeyC42lEKxQEubfYHcW3Uknob791/g=; b=sTdsLXFRE+QcyX+0QJ8WCgaQYk jiSZ6Kg9oD2pelNjtWjILcEQkP/tyHd4UJmsQbaA2Jitxjalcki5VI03zdGPwpwTxSoe3aIbli3qQ dWH7sElHDAutoKt8KDm5nian7HuEUHVgySIzKpZXw53KNkQNHisfiYi9aT2zUjYwSYlqMi/pKFh4h lR+8fzkY2is97ohNEfJiNYIyw5wG0OUC6MDW4MRyh7HEtQLG80vucUI1prRhC7ITcRjqm0SAho5j2 lxk7qbgnL2WHJoutm2s37b7MEjM+hCAz2PrtFU951qAi7PqrN+vxilNTvPssOcF0h7m744Qbr1drk dX6rIqQw==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rzL7i-00000001AcU-0fdH; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:44:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:44:10 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240422094436.3625171-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240422094436.3625171-1-rppt@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , x86@kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , Donald Dutile , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Nadav Amit , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Russell King , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Will Deacon , Heiko Carstens , Steven Rostedt , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet , li nux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dinh Nguyen , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Eric Chanudet , Palmer Dabbelt , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrew Morton , Rick Edgecombe , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:44:21PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > (something went wrong with the prevois posting, sorry for the noise) > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better than having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v5 Thanks! I've merged and pushed this onto modules-next in its entirety now for wider testing. Luis