From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F7EFC25B4F for ; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=JvNPgBvv; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VYh9g1hvQz3cX7 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 00:53:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=JvNPgBvv; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.73.55; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=acme@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VYh8t4PdKz3cF6 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 00:53:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB1FCE126E; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B756BC4AF63; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:52:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715093580; bh=G2fd/G6gHoEl3QR40FzwdMkgc9pQE2sWSv49OHbI4d4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JvNPgBvvlZTMle2tmEciAGw4tri1AC80m9Gm4LuqqYzLzoD5yn/+U4w1lq0hVsEPN NuNmtC1elTWZev4XncK6IHzUFAxmbg4LwnEV2c9vAfCl5HJiireagp/Ej8oPJKGuul /6wHXPs9HT5lEn/+xwvxUOqeUwCCUpDzN95f5CsNZGT/7Chke0GafGBJQAcZez/uUq 7poyjgcEqoT6wr6EBEJHitW+ROmlFfZzQBtREzVs2C9YM3212ZkdWRARw8oLHMVc5H OynWw14pkd5xCPEp01lHucmRHRS0CLawCT4nnn2ZQ71hfKMrdUUgBFHkFabTYqEwrO EdReYeVrSrymw== Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:52:57 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] tools/perf: Fix a comment about multi_regs in extract_reg_offset function Message-ID: References: <20240506121906.76639-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20240506121906.76639-4-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: irogers@google.com, Athira Rajeev , kjain@linux.ibm.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, jolsa@kernel.org, akanksha@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:40:15PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:19 AM Athira Rajeev > wrote: > > > > Fix a comment in function which explains how multi_regs field gets set > > for an instruction. In the example, "mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4)", the > > comment mistakenly referred to "dst_multi_regs = 0". Correct it to use > > "src_multi_regs = 0" > > > > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev > > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Cherry picked this one into perf-tools-next. Thanks, - Arnaldo