From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74773C25B7C for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 05:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OFtu+AIv; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=gKgvAIJr; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OFtu+AIv; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=gKgvAIJr; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Vnjzh34gwz79Hv for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 14:56:48 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OFtu+AIv; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=gKgvAIJr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OFtu+AIv; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=gKgvAIJr; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.de (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=osalvador@suse.de; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Vnjyt5fBgz3gMW for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 14:56:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5601F8BD; Mon, 27 May 2024 04:56:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1716785763; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xC5zp4HlZu07QkP75GPGGYKgpdHreqvBoXt6mnZlkEs=; b=OFtu+AIvEFBHI7CLLozC3h/eRZHm8F+B2wBXLlvWcSR+3kbPqOHglqZW6aTQ7l75/l1e4x XZfAbxQqlMCOH3ujBeCuGIFJeSUsqGMEl63asJ8IH/j6Di1uvzBemsF2ICZ4vlLm7rlzit DftKcNb86yaaxN+Mlh9ls7ix4sKsLqo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1716785763; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xC5zp4HlZu07QkP75GPGGYKgpdHreqvBoXt6mnZlkEs=; b=gKgvAIJrkIFFeoKTrAZkAnnA+2IeuOQm55UrZ0Sh6aHkWiHBHRpf5XdVO55mjjnQGk0brV ak70Quay7XyHLjAA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1716785763; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xC5zp4HlZu07QkP75GPGGYKgpdHreqvBoXt6mnZlkEs=; b=OFtu+AIvEFBHI7CLLozC3h/eRZHm8F+B2wBXLlvWcSR+3kbPqOHglqZW6aTQ7l75/l1e4x XZfAbxQqlMCOH3ujBeCuGIFJeSUsqGMEl63asJ8IH/j6Di1uvzBemsF2ICZ4vlLm7rlzit DftKcNb86yaaxN+Mlh9ls7ix4sKsLqo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1716785763; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xC5zp4HlZu07QkP75GPGGYKgpdHreqvBoXt6mnZlkEs=; b=gKgvAIJrkIFFeoKTrAZkAnnA+2IeuOQm55UrZ0Sh6aHkWiHBHRpf5XdVO55mjjnQGk0brV ak70Quay7XyHLjAA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9786713A6B; Mon, 27 May 2024 04:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 9T1yImISVGaodAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 27 May 2024 04:56:02 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 06:55:53 +0200 From: Oscar Salvador To: Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.30 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.977]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[linux-foundation.org,nvidia.com,redhat.com,ellerman.id.au,gmail.com,vger.kernel.org,kvack.org,lists.ozlabs.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.de:email] X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Xu , Jason Gunthorpe , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads > to the following error: > > CC arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o > arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte': > arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr] > 506 | } > | ^ > arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here > 394 | pud_t pud, *pudp; > | ^~~ > arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here > > This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case. > > So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real > pointers and not on on-stack copies. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy Maybe this could be folded into the patch that makes pmd_leaf() not returning always false, but no strong feelings: Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador -- Oscar Salvador SUSE Labs