linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86: Fold kvm_arch_sched_in() into kvm_arch_vcpu_load()
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:16:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlYte16cvQpPGHkx@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c77f3931-31b2-4695-bd74-c69cba9b96c1@intel.com>

On Fri, May 24, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
> > @@ -1548,6 +1548,9 @@ static void svm_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> >   	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> >   	struct svm_cpu_data *sd = per_cpu_ptr(&svm_data, cpu);
> > +	if (vcpu->scheduled_out && !kvm_pause_in_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> > +		shrink_ple_window(vcpu);
> > +
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -1517,6 +1517,9 @@ void vmx_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> >   {
> >   	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> > +	if (vcpu->scheduled_out && !kvm_pause_in_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> > +		shrink_ple_window(vcpu);
> > +
> 
> Nit:  Perhaps we need a kvm_x86_ops::shrink_ple_window()?  :-)

Heh, that duplicate code annoys me too.  The problem is the "old" window value
comes from the VMCS/VMCB, so either we'd end up with multiple kvm_x86_ops, or
we'd only be able to consolidate the scheduled_out + kvm_pause_in_guest() code,
which isn't all that interesting.

Aha!  Actually, VMX already open codes the functionality provided by VCPU_EXREG_*,
e.g. has vmx->ple_window_dirty.  If we add VCPU_EXREG_PLE_WINDOW, then the info
get be made available to common x86 code without having to add new hooks.  And
that would also allow moving the guts of handle_pause()/pause_interception() to
common code, i.e. will also allow deduplicating the "grow" side of things.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-28 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-22  1:40 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: Fold kvm_arch_sched_in() into kvm_arch_vcpu_load() Sean Christopherson
2024-05-22  1:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: Add a flag to track if a loaded vCPU is scheduled out Sean Christopherson
2024-05-22 15:16   ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-22  1:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: VMX: Move PLE grow/shrink helpers above vmx_vcpu_load() Sean Christopherson
2024-05-22  1:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86: Fold kvm_arch_sched_in() into kvm_arch_vcpu_load() Sean Christopherson
2024-05-23 22:47   ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-28 19:16     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-05-29 10:50       ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-29 12:54         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-22  1:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: Delete the now unused kvm_arch_sched_in() Sean Christopherson
2024-05-24  1:50   ` maobibo
2024-05-22  1:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86: Unconditionally set l1tf_flush_l1d during vCPU load Sean Christopherson
2024-05-23 22:42   ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-22  1:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: x86: Drop now-superflous setting of l1tf_flush_l1d in vcpu_run() Sean Christopherson
2024-05-23 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: Fold kvm_arch_sched_in() into kvm_arch_vcpu_load() Huang, Kai
2024-06-12  1:18 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZlYte16cvQpPGHkx@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).