From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
feng.tang@intel.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
lkp@intel.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
ying.huang@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, nbd@other.debian.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
fengwei.yin@intel.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:32:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoOs9wdR1yBPB-7J@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZoJnO09LBj6kApY7@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 04:22:19PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> from below, it seems the patchset doesn't introduce any performance improvement
> but a regression now. is this expected?
Not having the improvement at least alleviate my concerns about data
integrity. I'm still curious where it comes from as it isn't exactly
expected.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 2:28 [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement kernel test robot
2024-06-25 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-26 2:10 ` Oliver Sang
2024-06-26 3:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-27 2:35 ` Oliver Sang
2024-06-27 4:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01 8:22 ` Oliver Sang
2024-07-02 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoOs9wdR1yBPB-7J@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).