From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2098DC3DA64 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 18:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=tqipnU2F; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WZcHX5L6Mz3dW8 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 04:02:16 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=tqipnU2F; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::549; helo=mail-pg1-x549.google.com; envelope-from=3e82rzgykdaiugcpleiqqing.eqonkpwzrre-fgxnkuvu.q1ncdu.qti@flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-pg1-x549.google.com (mail-pg1-x549.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::549]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WZcGl6959z30Wc for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 04:01:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pg1-x549.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7a23a0fb195so7397196a12.0 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 11:01:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1722535292; x=1723140092; darn=lists.ozlabs.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xl2Pju3NY9Fnm1xajnPNr4ZOFDET+sfv7XV8JXyIerc=; b=tqipnU2Fzxk8dDfkeB/IkKdFGgviVP9Vn9bgiEO0vmSP7SXvhKBQupRSruSwp/qEZI NoISbCQO5AlKR0z2rTXwaXsIjtCcb/pe74C7fA3e2zkvPWAsuImAkdNWJZz1Sd9SYIOU GZyAhcUCR5czfpPEtDo+u2Zm29whFculWpkaksQonMk/N7wkIdX6FEFTh92mXMwEg8Rq IHOnr4tg4QHQjrbBa8K5obElXVkyRysG+b2Kxl6GPN+z5YyxxfjwP48N63rdyjWM785E jxIESNfyNOezeZZVyDp1OhjDPQ4WvGh/5h3A+EK8kCFZUI8twQqe532AAqaHqEXzQ6JH LIRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722535292; x=1723140092; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xl2Pju3NY9Fnm1xajnPNr4ZOFDET+sfv7XV8JXyIerc=; b=Q8/LHW43MXEEI2v3eJs138nJW1wshY6wcs1x6MqF8w2unX9kEF7B1rg4H8VDKram0n uZeuDSXLC5fYKzfs/V7Gl+ilXOkDvMC7iDmb/aCCG/8KIcfl4kCAxefjYRPGIZ8ffd1q Fxy/rRVQ6iMHmJiQlhixsW9W5BvgU3jFkg0zw7tlipPTEq+KcfeWZAGrja/3E597JEPW isnzvYv04UTVcSKjLZH6znQaqgaZQJ/PeZ6lknnRHkh4bMkBAP/TsWMUpVAxECnPZfb5 eG61q5vhTnRWqm75vOLUBdJcbdUorUQSShGwjyeqDEVnK59FeTgYvNZ+9gz14+H9R1UX C3pg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXmJEFalriPh3kiTGV2NpeNfGGzMNDNZpWla2mtJwMMZqxM500jkE2nkPCsLiuS9fW9VzBsoSW/NN/kUMQBiyOkpN09zBwqYRBbgnKyKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyQiTYOVMVxZNIqNHXsQjbPO0zDNSNj5IUdpmG+MFhBkGxZiCyt NJEVZ3Dmzwllo7eQQlKfUUd4g3Gd45OmGRsRibrRpUpKEUWtD5KC+XGIfeI9CnOxWkb8VwPB+/j SNQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF64U8Ib+bNIe3iPxoSzJOvvilQGXPjPZq7Y/8acNPwlcg0hACHnvmYPGnFv3dx9aufX4l27GJDySU= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a65:6252:0:b0:75a:b299:85b6 with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7b74669c7b3mr1534a12.2.1722535291408; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 11:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:01:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20240726235234.228822-1-seanjc@google.com> <20240726235234.228822-3-seanjc@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/84] KVM: arm64: Disallow copying MTE to guest memory while KVM is dirty logging From: Sean Christopherson To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Claudio Imbrenda , Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Christian Borntraeger , Albert Ou , Bibo Mao , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Paul Walmsley , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Upton , Palmer Dabbelt , David Stevens , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Anup Patel , Paolo Bonzini , Tianrui Zhao , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Aug 01, 2024, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Sean Christopherson writes: > > > Disallow copying MTE tags to guest memory while KVM is dirty logging, as > > writing guest memory without marking the gfn as dirty in the memslot could > > result in userspace failing to migrate the updated page. Ideally (maybe?), > > KVM would simply mark the gfn as dirty, but there is no vCPU to work with, > > and presumably the only use case for copy MTE tags _to_ the guest is when > > restoring state on the target. > > > > Fixes: f0376edb1ddc ("KVM: arm64: Add ioctl to fetch/store tags in a guest") > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > > --- > > arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c > > index e1f0ff08836a..962f985977c2 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c > > @@ -1045,6 +1045,11 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm, > > > > mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock); > > > > + if (write && atomic_read(&kvm->nr_memslots_dirty_logging)) { > > + ret = -EBUSY; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > > > is this equivalent to kvm_follow_pfn() with kfp->pin = 1 ? No, gfn_to_pfn_prot() == FOLL_GET, kfp->pin == FOLL_PIN. But that's not really relevant. > Should all those pin request fail if kvm->nr_memslots_dirty_logging != 0? No, the conflict with dirty logging is specifically that this code doesn't invoke mark_page_dirty(). And it can't easily do that, because there's no loaded ("running") vCPU, i.e. doing so would trip this WARN: #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu && vcpu->kvm != kvm)) return; WARN_ON_ONCE(!vcpu && !kvm_arch_allow_write_without_running_vcpu(kvm)); <==== #endif