From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61D23C3DA4A for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 18:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=noIGMSXT; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Wfwvm0M3Cz2yNR for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 04:45:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=noIGMSXT; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=namhyung@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wfwv128fkz2xfq for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 04:44:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F0B61599; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 18:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B939C32782; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 18:44:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723142667; bh=yBncEqq2sXHui7DWw9Ittf1PXvuGN/iNU/JonnHljMk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=noIGMSXT7Cvt5hAE7vaVJP0P1JaaPtBDQ+rGBNcM16SDg3OK3291zy0SG8KV8mw+t Acb3eIoVrJ1pshi2YtoOMIquTa6bARoB/vKi+1LNa+8OdcpY2I+zKFLt9VG21U0mqa tAYi0OQcKlcKbQyAQ9GoqPsov+PsJ4e0fKGCQ2Z4KItPyAtu6O8gj049NzMJFmwOhW EEYbZIOpaMmRy+9x7oz0fNdjiNtR9KL7LWoet3JWYXV4sjTlHSAE/tCKqqTQfoiND2 TLXIzC4sfB8w1bW11sWeURtvmDu+daDOVDcr5fHsarjZ4pMF92CdZ0FqRneLIhfHO2 eblAmXk0gRORA== Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 11:44:24 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Athira Rajeev Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Sync tools and kernel headers for v6.11 Message-ID: References: <20240806225013.126130-1-namhyung@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ian Rogers , linuxppc-dev , Arnd Bergmann , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Kajol Jain , James Clark , Thomas Richter , Adrian Hunter , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , LKML , linux-perf-users , Jiri Olsa , Leo Yan , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hello, On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:14:12PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: > > > > On 7 Aug 2024, at 11:42 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 03:50:03PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This is the usual sync up in header files we keep in tools directory. > >> I put a file to give the reason of this work and not to repeat it in > >> every commit message. The changes will be carried in the perf-tools > >> tree. > > > > Could you please double check what's in the tmp.perf-tools branch at the > > perf-tools tree so I don't break build and perf trace for arm64, powerpc > > and s390? It has this patchset + arm64 unistd header revert (according > > to the discussion on patch 6/10) on top of v6.11-rc2. > > > > Thanks, > > Namhyung > Hi Namhyung, > > Can you please point to the tree. I checked in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git as well as https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git , but didn’t find the changes. May be I am missing something. I am trying to check the build in powerpc. Oh, sorry about that. It's in: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git (no -next at the end) Thanks, Namhyung