From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xRSTp2p3DzDqp8 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:38:21 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: block/ps3vram: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in ps3vram_cache_init() To: Geoff Levand , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jens Axboe , Jim Paris , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras References: <8d140d00-935c-da0a-ff2e-167abe642bda@infradead.org> <32cdcd8a-1000-223c-71da-4c9119954d4e@users.sourceforge.net> <3a657b44-2bc8-ee05-3a42-db7af354967e@infradead.org> <57b472a0-0245-f821-cea8-171c34cc9df7@users.sourceforge.net> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:23:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/798575/ > > I submitted your patch Thanks for your constructive feedback. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/798850/ > and a fix to ps3vram_probe() with the other patches in my queue. I find it nice that you picked this change opportunity up after a bit of discussion (before an other developer would eventually have tackled it also). “Check return of ps3vram_cache_init” https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/798853/ 1. Unfortunately, I find that this specific update suggestion does not fit to the Linux coding style convention. “… Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do. …” 2. How do you think about to use the check “if (error)” instead? 3. Will an additional commit description be useful? Regards, Markus